Laserfiche WebLink
47 <br /> February 8,1989 <br /> Dennis Derlckson of the Planning Dept.said they had discussed doing <br /> study of streets that could be used as view streets in the city so <br /> that they wouldn't all be vacated,but this is time consuming. <br /> Councilmember Pope suggested this be continued for two weeks so thest $$� <br /> aff could review whether an easement should be retained, vacate vy <br /> only portion of the <br /> property r some other recommendation and 4� <br /> bring this back to c '1. ecom i <br /> Moved dv Councllmember Pope, seconded by Councllmember Gipson to ' 1 <br /> table tM1ie item Por two reeks. <br /> Roll was called with all councilmembers voting Yee except President <br /> Notion carried. .1 <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-LID 726 "r. <br /> ! 1 <br /> COUNCIL BILL No.891-7 i <br /> FINAL READING: 1{. <br /> AN ORDINANCEproving and confirming the assessments and LL 1 <br /> assessmant roll of Local Improvement District No.e 726 for the <br /> Improvement of 60th Street S.W. end Hardeson Road :.I <br /> provided <br /> ovidedt by Odrdinance No. 1320-87, end levying end assessing <br /> tracts, parcels of ense land and Bof other against heal several lots, <br /> assessment roll. property ssM1own onthe <br /> President Niva opened the hearing on LIO 726 for the Improvement of �1 <br /> Merrill eek Parkway end Hardeson Road stating the council will <br /> proceed in an orderly wayand asked for cooperation in followingthe <br /> es <br /> procedures. She id a t x oiler was in attendance and asked <br /> everyone to state their namee and address upon speaking. <br /> She said shecould be presiding and the council members r <br /> concerned that these hearings be fair in form and substance and fair <br /> appearanceeas well. She then asked If any council member knew of <br /> any al or potential conflict which should cause that member to <br /> avoid participation In the hearing and no one replied. <br /> She <br /> Por tn eduested any property owner or representative who obmectetl <br /> any to her participation <br /> participation in er hearing to please step forward end state the <br /> reasons. No one replied. <br /> President Niva pointed out no formal rules of evidence will co trol <br /> this hearing and the purpose of the hearing is to afford individual <br /> Property o Oportunity to preaeht information and evidence f <br /> to the CitCouncil explaining the reasons for any oblectron to <br /> proposed sassessment.r session The hearing is not sintended to be a question <br /> properand nsw owners obut, instead, is the final opportunity for t�i1 <br /> 11 <br /> before action is taken present <br /> tconfirm evidence <br /> final assessment roll council <br /> r <br /> Ls not the time to ask questions about the nature of the protect or F'�� <br /> the improvements that have been installed, unless those questions <br /> relate to the amount en assessment41 1,. <br /> which the city proposes to <br /> levy against the property, y. <br />