1989/11/15 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

November 15,1989 475 WHEREAS, CascadeSrveying and Engineering, Inc., representativefor property owners Dave Hudson and Greg Norrie, hereinafter referred to a "applicant" has made formal application for an amendment to the Land Use Map of the Everett General Plan and feet for the Rezone e of propen the rty containi=g pproximateiy 21,000 square starryt, the illegal description of which is Lots 116 ntre1t antl k th Plat of Beverly Hills,Division No.A;and en,n1,Block 3, airyWHEREAS,the General Plan Land Use Designation of the subject "rtes is Ingle family SingledF B to 12 Densityg); per gross tree, nil the zoning Se q_2(Single Faaily HigM1 Density); tl WHEREAS, the Applicant has requested that the General Plan Land Use designation be changed to"Highway Commercial"and that the zoning be changed to B-2(Community Shopping);and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held public hearings 0 April 2o5, 1989 at Which the appllcent a tl the andiRezonePe offered comments y about 9the proposed Geneial Plan Amentlm"nt WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the requested various General Plan Amendment and Rezone and analyzed the proposal and General Plan land use alternatives far consistency with the adopted policies for Commercial Land Use;and Council WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended to the City that htichthe Planning Commission adaptedbin its ne esolution upon based o �I 89-21;and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission at its own public hearing end hes considered the testimony of the applicant and the public. NOW for AmendmenttoTHEREFORE, Landl Use SN p of theSOLVED, that Everette Generalthe Aplicant's Preust lan"is I� Celhereby denied end furthermore, the denial of the requested Genera/ an estAmendment precludes City Council consideration of the Rezone qu . The City Council bases this decision on the following findings: 1. The Applicant has failed to demonstrate that circumstances have changed substantially since the adoption of the General Plan Land Use.,Map and Policies (Residential, 1986; Commercial, 1987) that warrant the changing of the subject residential property for commercial uses 2. Throuthe lack of a specific site development plan for the proposed p ed use of the subject property, the applicant has failed to and trate that the proposed amendment of the Everett General Plan and Rezonenne w commerll cially tn n ore efficient use of and improvement to z ned properties in the vicinity. i 5. The use of a local street (Fleming Street) as a land u transition between"Highway Cpmmerciel"and"Single FamilDetached" uses is not sufficient t"protect the Character of the residential neighborhood located on the west side of Fleming Street.