Laserfiche WebLink
670 <br /> CDecember 11,1991 <br /> C=Inu:ythel 22-.1nee°11°%'thlelOrpttibtioncil Moser to <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes except <br /> councilman Pope who voted no and Councilmen Anderson, Gipson <br /> and Overstreet who were excused. <br /> n. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> C Z',fe'lrlImg1=earfrilger°rottheactti7nehemPsInZs annex'ti"would <br /> REPORT-TRANBIT CENTER ACTION PLAN <br /> Bill Link stated that the Everett Transit staff has evaluated <br /> options for improved transit service and amenities and makes <br /> the following recommendation regarding the Transit Center. 1) <br /> The current downtown transit center proposal be cancelled. 2) <br /> Investigate other alternatives, taking into consideration: <br /> systek, demand and requirements, re-development potential of <br /> downtown area, and Everett Transit/Community Transit interface <br /> requirements. 3) A downtown transit mall concept may be <br /> appropriate in the long term after establishment of a downtown <br /> transit focal point, demands for transit service in the <br /> clowntown area and development of downtown core. 6) A transit <br /> mall concept should be phased-in in concert with downtown <br /> growth allowing time to comprehensively evaluate the Everett <br /> Transit system demand and service. 5) The Everett Transit <br /> staff will propose a complete.teansit system review early in <br /> 1992. <br /> ="grjr,:ir%f;orwa'slafILTITIantdbei'cuirtregrd== <br /> transit center proposal on the Drumheller property be <br /> cancelled. Mr.Link stated that was correct. <br /> Councilman Diamond was concerned that the studies already done <br /> had been done for naught. Br. Link reassured Councilman <br /> Diamond that those studies could still be used. <br /> • <br /> Ken Housden, Public Works Director, reported that the City has <br /> been working with CT. Also what was envisioned several years <br /> agoIsrgx1ttbetvbesyttlterest today. A transit mall concept • <br />