2300 KASCH PARK RD 2020-12-31 - Laserfiche WebLink

• • • a. City of Everett Comment:The proposed IEBC criteria for this project shall be stated by the DOR. The criteria shall justify the replacement of the deck with the proposed "in-kind" construction. Response: KPFF Comments:This project is a repair per IEBC section 502. b. City of Everett Comment:The report states to replace the deck with the same gage and connections as the existing construction. The existing connections shall be specified in the report. Response: KPFF Comments:Specifying the existing connections is not necessary. The new proposed deck and connections,as shown on revised sheet S1.0(Revision 1 for permit comments),are better than or equal to the existing conditions. c. City of Everett Comment:The gage,depth,and structural properties for the deck shall be specified in the drawings. Response: KPFF Comments:See revised sheet S1.0(Revision 1 for permit comments)that indicates gauge, depth &structural properties for the replaced roof deck.The design characteristics of the new proposed deck are better than or equal to the existing deck. d. City of Everett Comment:The required connections (size,transverse spacing, interior spacing, sidelap connection type and spacing, etc.)shall be specified in the drawings. Response: KPFF Comments:See revised sheet S1.0 (Revision 1 for permit comments) that indicates the connections for the replaced roof deck. The new proposed deck includes connections that are better than or equal to existing connections. 8. City of Everett Comment:The details on Sheet R10 appear to indicate that new roofing will be applied on the new deck. Verify if the existing construction includes roofing. The designer-of-record (DOR)should determine if Chapter 7 is the governing criteria proposed for the project, and verify if the design meets and is acceptable per Exception 3. Note that due to modifications to the structural roof diaphragm,this project may qualify as a Level 2 Alternation and required a structural lateral analysis depending on the increase in the roof weight(i.e., 10%?). Response: KPFF Comments:The details on sheet R10 do not relate to the Vault Canopy. The details on sheet R10 relate only to Building C and the Fuel Island Building. Both of these building will retain their existing structural decks. Remove Sheet R10 from this package. 9. City of Everett Comment: Detail 1/R12 references Detail 5/S1.0. The work required in Detail 5/S1.0 is not clear. It is not clear if the detail shows a plan or elevation view. Detail 5/S1.0 appears to show adding a news'