Laserfiche WebLink
a 0 <br />2. Please see all redlines on the attached plans for required corrections in addition to all comments listed <br />below. Frequently, redlines will be stand-alone and will not have an associated item in this corrections <br />letter. Likewise, comments below may not have associated redlines. Please indicate to the City that all <br />redlines have been adequately addressed by providing checkmarks or notes next to the City's redlines to <br />indicate that it has been picked up or to answer a reviewer's question. A comment response letter can <br />also be included with your resubmittal to address the comments below (handwritten remarks under each <br />comment on this letter are perfectly acceptable). The below listed sheets have redlines. <br />yf SheetC1.0- ftSpor+", C-ax`a+^3 C."r 17, 1W t-�3U+n, <br />Sheet C2.0 - Z ; 7k. v6_)cs -^ c-%o Wocze, <br />Sheet C2.1 0 ,>;-r, & J,t <br />SheetC3.0 yspQ,s+cs <br />Sheet C3.1 - �,,,c�; ° <br />SheetC4.0 _ ?ssp6r✓us= C13 c^�3w ,4� � WIAV4 00ia� <br />Sheet C5.0 - �g�xa,.►e�.: 5o> Pe iokc z_Ari6cvt, <br />viii. Sheet A2.01 in Architectural Plan Set: Plans have been redlined for an approved as noted <br />with the following note: "Vehicle access point for stacked parking should be designed to <br />minimize conflict between other vehicles in the garage and vehicles accessing the stack." <br />The suggestion would be to design the stack for the loading space to be at the north end, <br />so that vehicles trying to enter or exit the garage are not impacted by the stack's access <br />point location. Where it is currently shown is very close to the garage entrance and would <br />create possible queueing issues. We can either keep the plans redlined with the note <br />above, or you can revise sheet A2.01 for the two stacks and turn in two copies of this <br />sheet to slip sheet into the building set. Please let us know which option you are choosing. <br />Note that the Building plans correction letter will be issued separately from this civil <br />review correction letter. <br />X. Please fill in the following quantities for stormwater tracking and permit fee calculations: <br />• Quantity of pollution generating hard surfaces (driveway(s)) in square feet:?1 i <br />• Quantity of non -pollution generating hard surfaces in square feet:'7995 <br />• Roof area in square feet* I gnc-A4 . <br />- eye_)` Hardscape area in square feet: r <br />0 1 <br />The comments below were generated from this project's Stormwater Reviewer. If you have any questions <br />regarding these comments, please contact Arnie Roshak with the City of Everett Surface Water <br />Department (425-257-7249 or ARoshak@everettwa.gov). <br />a. In the drainage report/supplemental narrative, update the evaluation of LID BMPs beyond what <br />is currently written. Currently listed is the 10' requirement between building and infiltrating <br />facility. Also relevant is the 10' requirement between property line and infiltrating facility as well <br />as the zoning code requirement for open space requirements to be useable and not include <br />stormwater facilities (see EMC 19.15.040 and item 4.b below). <br />l The comments below were generated from this project's Planning Reviewer. If you have any questions <br />regarding these comments, please contact Dave Tyler with the City of Everett Planning Division (425-257- <br />7164 or DTyler@everettwa.gov). <br />a. Landscape Plan (Sheet A1.03) -provide physical separation between the open space area <br />fronting on N. Broadway and the public sidewalk. This can be accomplished using landscaping, <br />low fencing or wall, or other means (EMC 19.31A.030.C.1.a.). <br />O3200 <br />Cedar Street <br />® 425.257.8810 <br />everetteps@everettwa.gov <br />Everett, WA 98201 <br />425.257.8857 fax <br />everettwa.gov/permits <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />