Laserfiche WebLink
Bidder Comments Form <br /> Document Title: Replacement of Reservoir 2 Bidder Question Log Date: 2/23/2021 <br /> Item <br /> No. Dwg/Fig No. Reviewer's Comments Comment by Designer's Response <br /> Drawings,Specs,Report or Other Document(Refer to document below in Comments) <br /> ENTER SHEET <br /> NUMBER OR SPEC <br /> NUMBER BIDDER COMMENTS COMPANY RESPONSE <br /> Crushed rock layer directly beneath the reservoir can be increased to 6"thick,as long as related thicknesses are not decreased in <br /> the process. <br /> 1)Drawing CD2(sheet 55)—The crushed rock layer per KN E directly beneath the reservoir floor <br /> slab is shown to be 3"thick.There are 2 constructability concerns with this thin layer beneath <br /> the slab.A)We will be unable to obtain compaction on a 3"thick layer and 2)Due to the mat <br /> slab being 18"thick we need to be able to set grade stakes and bulk head stakes to a depth of Ward Henshaw <br /> 8". Please clarify that during construction this layer can be increased to a minimum of 6"and <br /> that it will also be acceptable to drive these stakes beyond this layer a few inches Into the drain <br /> rock below. We will not puncture the liner,however,we need to be able to drive our stakes to <br /> a minimum depth of 8-9 inches within the floor slab area during concrete placement. <br /> Drawing C120 Key Note 13 and referenced drawing M6 calls out a specific style of staff Blocking out roof penetrations is acceptable. <br /> gauge. For bidding purposes there are no details or noted clarifications we can find for the <br /> type of roof penetration required for this gauge.We assume it's acceptable to block-out the Ward Henshaw <br /> roof penetrations)In the roof slab per manufacturers acceptance rather than core drilling <br /> after the roof Is placed. If core drilling is required please clarify. <br /> IIIIII E E - - MN M M E — - - MO M — MN E w <br />