Laserfiche WebLink
9 0 <br />Compass Health <br />August 31, 2017 <br />J N 17399 <br />Page 2 <br />based on the proposed construction, anticipated subsurface conditions and those encountered <br />during exploration, and the scope of work outlined in our proposal. <br />The test pits were excavated on August 24, 2017 with a small, rubber -tracked excavator. A <br />geotechnical engineer from our staff observed the excavation process, logged the test pits, and <br />obtained representative samples of the soil encountered. "Grab" samples of selected subsurface <br />soil were collected from the excavator bucket. The Test Pit Logs are attached to this report as <br />Plates 3 and 4. <br />The test boring was drilled on August 9, 2017 using a track -mounted, hollow -stem auger drill. <br />Samples were taken at approximate 5-foot intervals with a standard penetration sampler. This split - <br />spoon sampler, which has a 2-inch outside diameter, is driven into the soil with a 140-pound <br />hammer falling 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampler a given distance <br />is an indication of the soil density or consistency. A geotechnical engineer from our staff observed <br />the drilling process, logged the test borings, and obtained representative samples of the soil <br />encountered. The Test Boring Logs are attached as Plate 5. <br />Soil Conditions <br />The test boring was located in the upper, western part of the property. It encountered sand <br />with gravel and silt that was initially loose to medium -dense, but then dense at a depth of 5 <br />feet. That soil transitioned to silty sand with gravel that was very dense at 10 feet. That <br />material is known geologically as glacial till; this soil continued to the explored depth of 30.4 <br />feet. <br />The four test pits were excavated in the lower, central portion of the site. Those explorations <br />revealed unengineered fill that was about 1.5 to 4 feet thick. The fill in three of the test pits <br />contained rubble that likelyoriginated from the house that previously occupied that area. In <br />the fourth test pit the fill was underlain by 6 inches of topsoil. The fill and topsoil, where' <br />present, were followed by silty sand with gravel that was loose to medium -dense and <br />became dense glacial till at depths of 4.5 to 5.5 feet. <br />Although our explorations did not encounter cobbles or boulders, they are often found in <br />soils that have been deposited by glaciers or fast-moving water. <br />Groundwater Conditions <br />No groundwater seepage was observed in the pits or boring. However, it should be noted <br />that groundwater levels vary seasonally with rainfall and other factors, and are generally <br />highest during the normally wet winter and spring months. It is possible that groundwater <br />could be found in more permeable soil layers and between the looser near -surface soil and <br />the underlying glacial till during this time. <br />The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types at the <br />exploration locations. The actual transition between soil types may be gradual, and subsurface <br />conditions can vary between exploration locations. The logs provide specific subsurface information <br />only at the locations tested. Where a transition in soil type occurred between samples in the boring, <br />the depth of the transition was interpreted. The relative densities and moisture descriptions <br />indicated on the test pit and boring logs are interpretive descriptions based on the conditions <br />observed during excavation and drilling. <br />GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />