Laserfiche WebLink
Compass Health <br />August 31, 2017 <br />JN 17399 <br />Page 4 <br />bathing. Excessive water vapor trapped within structures can result in a variety of undesirable <br />conditions, including, but not limited to, moisture problems with flooring systems, excessively moist <br />air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may <br />be harmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential <br />vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or <br />mechanical, to prevent a buildup of excessive water vapor within the planned structure. <br />Geotech Consultants, Inc. should be allowed to review the final development plans to verify that the <br />recommendations presented in this report are adequately addressed in the design. Such a plan <br />review would be additional work beyond the current scope of work for this study, and it may include <br />revisions to our recommendations to accommodate site, development, and geotechnical <br />constraints that become more evident during the review process. <br />We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report <br />should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and <br />recommendations. <br />SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS <br />In accordance with the International Building Code (IBC), the site class within 100 feet of the <br />ground surface is best represented by Site Class Type, C (Very Dense Soil). As noted in the USGS <br />website, the mapped spectral acceleration value for a 0.2 second (SS) and 1.0 second period (Si) <br />equals 1.32g and 0.50g, respectively. <br />The IBC and ASCE 7 require that the potential for liquefaction (soil strength loss) be evaluated for <br />the peak ground acceleration of the Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE), which has a <br />probability of occurring once in 2,475 years (2 percent probability of occurring in a 50-year period). <br />The MCE peak ground acceleration is adjusted for site class effects (FPGA) and equals 0.55g. The <br />soils beneath the site are not susceptible to seismic liquefaction under the ground motions of the <br />MCE because of their dense nature and/or the absence of near -surface groundwater. <br />Sections 1803.5 of the IBC and 11.8 of ASCE 7 require that other seismic -related geotechnical <br />design parameters (seismic surcharge for retaining wall design and slope stability) include the <br />potential effects of the Design Earthquake. The peak ground acceleration for the Design <br />Earthquake is defined in Section 11.2 of ASCE 7 as two-thirds (2/3) of the MCE peak ground <br />acceleration, or 0.37g. <br />CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIONS <br />The proposed structure can be supported on conventional continuous and spread footings bearing <br />on undisturbed, dense, native soil. We recommend that continuous and individual spread footings <br />have minimum widths of 16 and 24 inches, respectively. Exterior footings should also be bottomed <br />at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finish ground surface for protection against frost and <br />erosion. The local building codes should be reviewed to determine if different footing widths or <br />embedment depths are required. Footing subgrades must be cleaned of loose or disturbed soil <br />prior to pouring concrete. Depending upon site and equipment constraints, this may require <br />removing the disturbed soil by hand. <br />GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. <br />