Laserfiche WebLink
. t • JN 9%072 <br /> James Pirie Page 10 <br /> . March 18, 1997 <br /> Beneath pavements 95% for upper 12 <br /> inches of subgrade, <br /> 90% below tha: :evel . <br /> Where: <br /> Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio, <br /> expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry <br /> density to the maximum dry density, as <br /> determined in accordance with ASTM Test <br /> Designation D 1557-78 (Modified Proctor). <br /> Use of On-Site Soil <br /> If grading activities take piace during wet weather, or when the silty, on-site soils are wet, <br /> site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rain and the potential need <br /> to import granular fill. The on-site soils are generally silty and therefore moisture-sensitive. <br /> Grading operations will be difiicult during wet weather, or when the rnoisture content of <br /> these soils exceeds the optimum moisture content. <br /> The moisture content of the silty, on-site soils must be at, or near, the optimum moisture <br /> content, as the soils cannot be consistently compacted fo the required density when the <br /> ' moisture content is significantly greater than optimum. The moisture content of the on-site <br /> soils was generally near the estimated optimum moisture content at the time of our <br /> explorations. The on-site silty sands underlying the topsoil could be used as structural fill, if <br /> grading operations are conducted during hot, dy weather, when drying the wetter soils by <br /> aeration is possible. Proper compaction of the silty sands during wet weather will generally <br /> not be possible. Duri�g excessively dry weather, however, it rnay be necessary to add <br /> water to achieve the optimum moisture content. <br /> Moisture-sensitive soils may also be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from <br /> construction equipment, or even foot traffic, when the mcisture content is greater than the <br /> optimum moisture content. it may be beneficial to protect subgrades with a layer of <br /> imported sand or crushed rock to limi!disturbance from traffic. <br /> Ideally, structural fill that will be placed in wet weather sfiould consist of a coarse, granular soil with <br /> a silt or ciay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 <br /> sieve should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-incli sieve. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> The analyses, conclusions, and recommerdations contained in this report are based on site <br /> conditions as they existed at the tima of our exploration and assume that the soil encountered in <br /> the test pits is representative of subsurface conditions on the site. if the subsurface conditions <br /> encountered during construction are significantiy different from those observed in our explorations, <br /> we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions and reconsider our <br /> iecommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are commonly encountered on <br /> construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil samples in test pits. <br /> ���20 <br /> ' GEOTECHCONSULTANTS,INC. <br /> r <br /> ._. � .__. '��.,.., � 4as.N.w 1'-': ,AS9e°�,— .�f'•` �'��a 1r...�r -a."–.e.,�..._.ri <br /> '���, r. ��r�'k�� +��.�rn� .� ..xt t'�.. ��c�.y�i's.�in.:.'��fAM�?c:.;+d <br /> �'.�.�. � ,�{.� - � <br /> �._.�. ;nu'A+Sm.�''^Mya�.. .� . .,� ,.. . h�.'i4!$�°%� ��. � . . ..�.� <br />