Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Mark Thunberg <br />Snohomish County Property Management <br />Plan Check Number: 131802-011, First Review (Structural) <br />June 18, 2018 <br />exclusively supports assembly areas. The load is not reducible per IBC Table 1607.1 <br />Footnote "m". The design should be revised. <br />c. The elevator lobby areas are designed for 80 psf loading. The framing in these areas only <br />supports assembly loading and should be designed for 100 psf per Sheets S-102 and S-103. <br />The design should be revised. <br />d. The office areas appear to be designed for an 80 psf unreducible load, which exceeds the <br />50 psf reducible load and 15 psf unreducible partition load per Sheet S-103. Please <br />confirm. If the loading is revised in response to the comments above, the loads should be <br />separated so that the 15 psf load is not reduced. <br />e. A load map for the roof framing is not included and should be submitted for review. The <br />map should include the penthouse areas if not explicitly modeled. <br />f. The Roof Load Map 16/S-103 specifies a cladding weight of 15 psf. The calculations <br />indicate line loads of 200 psf. Based on the 14 to 15 foot stories heights per the <br />architectural elevations, the line load will exceed 200 psf and should be increased. <br />g. The east sides of the stairway areas are only designed for Line Load "L1". It appears that <br />the framing on this side will also support one-half of the stairway load and should <br />concurrently include Line Load "14". The design should be reviewed and revised. <br />17. The "Loading Criteria" portion of Section 1.0 in the structural calculations specifies a 100 psf <br />"roof/snow" load. Sheet S-103 specifies a 25 psf load. The correct load should be verified. <br />See IBC Section 1603.1 and 1604.1. <br />18. The load schedule in Detail 20/S-103 specifies a flat roof snow load of 25 psf. The canopy and <br />roof on Sheets AF-102 and AF-106, respectively, have slopes of less than 1/2:12. The WABO- <br />SEAW White Paper "Snow Load Regulations and Engineering Practices" (August, 2000) <br />recommends applying an additional 5 psf rain surcharge for roof slopes less than 1/2:12 in <br />addition to the 25 psf snow load. The engineer -of -record should determine if this additional <br />load should be included in the design. The design of structural framing subjected to increased <br />loading should be reviewed and revised as needed. See IBC Sections 1603.1.3. <br />19. The load combinations used in the design are specified in Section 1.3.1 of the structural <br />calculations. IBC Equation 16-2 (i.e., 1.2D + 1.6L) should be revised to include the roof live <br />load. The design should also include load combinations 16-3 and 16-5. The factor fl=1.0 for <br />assembly areas (Note: Section 1605.2 appears to have a typo; reference IBC 2006 and 2009, <br />and ASCE 7-10 Section 2.3.2 for intended application of this factor) and other live loads <br />exceeding 100 psf. The earthquake load shall be the vertical earthquake load effect per IBC <br />Section 1613.1 and ASCE 7-10 Section 12.4.2.2. <br />20. Two existing columns on Grid F'/13.1-16.1 will be demolished at all levels per Sheets S-202 <br />through S-206. The existing floor framing will be resupported by the addition framing using <br />backspan framing per Detail 8/S-602. Calculations substantiating the backspan design shall be <br />submitted for review, including the beams and their connections that directly resist the <br />backspan load. The design shall include all applicable load combinations from IBC Section <br />1605.2. See IBC Section 1604.1 and 1604.4. <br />9 age5of11 <br />CITY OF EVERETT . 3200 Cedar Street • Everett, WA 98201 . (425) 257-8810 • Fax (425) 257-8857 <br />