Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Mark Thunberg <br />Snohomish County Property Management <br />Plan Check Number: B1802-011, First Review (Structural) <br />June 18, 2018 <br />33. Section 2.8 of the structural calculations states that the addition reduces loads in the existing <br />concrete shear walls. Sheets S-201 through 5-206 show new collectors on Grids 1/C-D and <br />24/C-D connected to the existing walls. The following comments should be addressed: <br />a. Calculations substantiating the collectors and connections should be submitted for review. <br />Note that it appears the collectors are required to provide a load path the shear walls on <br />Grids 1/D-E and 24/D-E which lack a direct connection to the diaphragms, and therefore <br />they are not voluntary. The collectors shall be design to the full provisions of the IBC per <br />IEBC Sections 807.2 and 807.6 Item 3. <br />b. The collectors and connections shall include the load increases per ASCE 7-10 Sections <br />12.3.3.4 and 12.10.2.1. See IBC Section 1613.1. <br />c. Combined flexural and axial loading calculations on the existing beams used as the <br />collectors shall be submitted for review. See IBC 2205.1 and AISC 360-10 Chapter H. <br />34. Continuing with the previous comment, Detail 2/S-601 shows the connection of the collector <br />through the existing column. The following comments should be addressed: <br />a. The connection appears to utilize the existing beam connection to the column. Calculations <br />substantiating the beam connection to for combined axial and vertical loads, including the <br />vertical seismic load of ASCE 7-10 Section 12.4.2.2, should be submitted for review. The <br />connection should utilize a welded or slip -critical bolted connections to direct load through <br />the beam instead of the floor slab. See IBC Sections 1604.1, 1604.4, and 1613.1. <br />b. Calculations substantiating the welded connection of the plate to the column should be <br />submitted for review. The calculation should include a check of the column base material. <br />c. The column weldability and requirements for preheating should be verified per AWS D1.1- <br />10 Sections 3.5 and 4.8.4. <br />d. The plate connection shows a two-sided fillet weld. It appears that only one side of the <br />column will be chipped away. Clarify how the connection will be performed. See IBC <br />Section 107.2.1. <br />e. The connection appears to occur in the corner of the shear wall core where end zone <br />reinforcement typically occurs. Clarify if reinforcement will be damaged. If reinforcement <br />is damaged, indicate how it will be repaired. Comment on the impact of the destructive <br />work to the performance of the concrete shear wall. Provide calculations as needed to <br />substantiate the response. <br />Miscellaneous: <br />35. The structural calculations do not appear to include a lateral design for the canopy roof shown <br />in Plan 9/S-251. Calculations substantiating the lateral load path shall be submitted for review. <br />See IBC Sections 1604.1, 1604.4, and 1613.1. <br />36. Elevations and details for the penthouse are provided on Sheet 5-321. The design is provided <br />in Section 2.10 of the structural calculations. The design appears to be incomplete. The <br />design should be reviewed and revised. See IEBC Section 807.5, and IBC Sections 1603.1 and <br />1604.1. Items to be reviewed include but are not limited to: <br />a. Beam specifications are missing in Elevation 5/S-321. <br />b. Detail 2/S-321 does not appear to match the conditions in Plan 19/5-251 and Elevation 5/S- <br />321. The section in the detail does not include a reference. <br />Page 9 Ifi1 <br />CITY OF EVERETT . 3200 Cedar Street • Everett, WA 98201 • (425) 257-8810 • Fax (425) 257-885 <br />