Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Bob Egleston <br />6ugust.2, 2018 <br />Page 2 <br />Structure Comment <br />14b. The following should be addressed: <br />MKA Response <br />MAGNUSSON <br />KLEMENCIC <br />ASSOCIATES <br />The design of the piles appears to be a i. "Deferred Structural Submittals" section <br />deferred submittal. The piles should be of the general notes on Sheet S-003 of <br />listed on Sheet 5-003 in the "Deferred the drawings submitted with the original <br />Structural Submittals" section. comment responses included micropiles <br />as a deferred structural submittal <br />ii. The pile design loads appear to exceed <br />the values specified in Table 7/S-401. <br />The tabulated values and the calculated <br />loads both appear to be ASD values. <br />See calculation pages 1047-1048 and <br />1055-1056, and page 15 of the <br />geotechnical report. <br />H. The micropile forces shown on pages <br />1047-1048 are strength level forces (The <br />sheet header is mislabeled as service <br />level forces). The micropile design <br />capacities shown on 7/S-401 are service <br />level forces and are equivalent to the <br />strength level forces divided by 1.5. For <br />clarity, the affected calculation pages <br />have been corrected and resubmitted <br />with this response letter. <br />iii. Verify the correct micropile types are iii. (4) micropiles on plan were labeled <br />specified for each location on Sheet S- incorrectly and have been corrected. <br />200. The revised sheet is included with this <br />response letter. <br />