2117 LINCOLN ST T MOBILE ANTENNA 2018-01-02 MF Import

2. Adequacy of streets, utilities and public services required to serve a proposed use. Finding: The adequacy of streets, utilities and public services are all unchanged as a result of the proposed use. The wireless facility is unmanned and applicant will utilize the existing access and parking area off Lincoln Street during ma;ntenance or repair. The facility will utilize existing power and telephone service, both of which a m already at the property. Conclusion: Existing streets and utilities are adequate to serve the proposed use. 3. Impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on the surrounding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety; the ability of the proponent to mitigate such potential impacts. Finding: There will be no traffic impact generated by the proposed facility. This site is an unmanned facility. The site will require normal maintenance visits by a single employee in a light duty vehicle approximately once a month. Conclusion: The proposed use is unmanned and will not generate traffic on the surrounding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety. Only one maintenance visit per month is required. 4. The provision for adequate off-street parking, on -site circulation and site access. Findin : The site is an unmanned facility and will require only one parking spot for a technician to park when servicing the equipment. Conclusion: This proposed project will not impact off-street parking, on -site circulation or site access. 5. Compatibility of proposed structures acid improvements with the surrounding properties, including the size, height, location setback and arrangement of all proposed buildings and facilities, especially as they relate to the light and shadow impacts on more sensitive land uses and less intensive zones. Finding: Existing poles or utility p,)les are common in most neighborhoods, including that of the subject site. Therefore they are necessary a 'd already present, creating a very low impact when equipment on the pole is changed, as regaro this project. The facilities' size, height, location, setback will remain as they are now under the existing use. Conclusion: The proposed co -location will be on an existing wireless communications utility pole and there will be no additional visual impact to surrounding properties. 6. the number, size and location of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. Finding: The applicant will not install any signs unless required by the FCC or the FAA. Conclusion: All signage must be reviewed and approved by the Everett Planning Department. 21