KPFF Consulting Engineers 12/30/2021

Later Phase Eclipse Mill Project 2. Existing cultural resources documentation is sufficient to demonstrate compliance with Section 106 and will be incorporated into the JARPA and SEPA Checklist. A Cultural Resources Assessment and survey will not be required to support this task. 3, A Water Quality Monitoring Plan will not be required for Section 401 compliance because best management practices during in-water construction will be sufficient for protection of water quality standards. 4. The CITY will be responsible for transferring the CSGP to the contractor. 5. For the CSGP, the Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, Stormwater Site Plan, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, and other supporting materials will be provided by others. 6, The CITY will be responsible for coordinating with Ecology regarding the proposed outfall extension for compliance with the existing NPDES permit(s). 7. The Project will occur on state-owned aquatic lands; therefore, consultation with WDNR will be required. It is assumed that the CITY will negotiate lease fees and activities. 8. A SSDP will be sufficient to demonstrate Shoreline Master Program compliance; a Conditional Use Permit or Variance will not be required. 9. There are ample onsite mitigation opportunities to offset unavoidable project impacts. This scope does not include budget for coordinating or designing on- or off-site mitigation. 10. For floodpiain code compliance, a No Net Rise Memo will be prepared by others. Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses will also be conducted by others, if required. 11. Construction-specific local permits and approvals may need to be obtained prior to construction occurring (e.g., building, grading, structural, or utility relocation permits). These permits and approvals will be determined upon further refinement of the Project and agency coordination and are not included in this permit scope of work. It is further assumed that any construction-specific local permits will be obtained by the project engineer. 12. The Mitigation Plan preparation does not include any design work to be completed under this task. Mitigation design will be prepared by others. 13. The wetland delineation only includes the offsite wetland located adjacent to the public trail to the south that is subject to erosion and will be relocated. There are no other onsite wetlands that will be delineated. 14. Hydrogeological modeling or monitoring will not be required and are not included in this task. 15. Agency comments on permit application materials will be relatively minor and will not require substantial new analysis or permit application materials to be developed. 16. This scope of work does not include work related to permit compliance during construction. 17. This scope of work does not include work related to permit appeals. Should support for permit appeals be required, a separate scope of services will need to be developed. 18. The CITY will pay for all permit and public notice fees associated with the project. Task 600 -60% Design Development and Plans Specifications and Estimate (KPFF, MacLeod Reckord & BlueCoast)