Laserfiche WebLink
Consultant will support the City in coordination with other project teams for relevant data for consistent <br />with future analysis. This coordination would include a meeting with the 1-5 HOV WSDOT project team. <br />Assumptions: <br />• Traffic counts will be collected by a vendor firm. The consulting team will coordinate with the <br />vendor to procure the traffic counts. <br />• Streetlight data, or a similar data source, will be purchased by the Consultant team through a <br />vendor firm. The consulting team will coordinate with the vendor to procure the travel pattern <br />data. <br />• The City will confirm the study intersections prior to the data collection effort. <br />Deliverables: <br />• Traffic counts and any other data collected by the consultant team will be provided to the City. <br />3) Project Definition and Evaluation <br />Scope: <br />Based upon the data collection (Task 2), transportation analysis (Task 5) and stakeholder engagement <br />(Task 6), the Consultant will develop draft and final project goals to define the project purpose. These <br />project goals will be used as guiding principles for the evaluation process and concept design. It is <br />anticipated that the project goals and evaluation process will reflect both required (baseline) and <br />desired (contextual) needs. These goals will be reviewed by City staff as well as input received by <br />stakeholders (task 6) <br />Based on the project goals developed, the Consultant will develop an evaluation process for review with <br />the City. This evaluation process, for scoping purposes, is assumed to be a two -level evaluation process. <br />The first level screening level will consider up to four (4) corridor -type concepts and up to twelve (12) <br />intersection/spot treatments. Corridor -type concepts would be multi -block improvements while spot <br />location/intersection concepts would be improvements at a specific location. This is further illustrated <br />in Table 1. For scoping purposes, the type of criteria in the first level screening will be high-level and <br />more qualitative; addressing key project goals such as freight performance, environmental impacts, <br />multi -modal safety, stakeholder/community support, cost & implementation feasibility. <br />Based on the first level screening results, the project team will advance up to three (3) corridor -type <br />improvements and up to eight (8) spot location/intersection concepts for further evaluation in the <br />second level screening (see Table 1). This second level screening would be more detailed, and the <br />majority of the criteria will be quantitative. For scoping purposes, the type of criteria in the second level <br />screening would include traffic and safety, right of way impacts, assessment of community support, <br />pedestrian/bicycle conflicts, park, wetland and historic property impacts (environmentally sensitive <br />areas), and cost estimate (to budget). <br />