Laserfiche WebLink
{Mr., Ms.} First Last Name <br /> Company <br /> Plan Check Number: Number, First Review <br /> Month Day, Year <br /> 16.The structure includes 2-foot long wood shear walls at the first story on the south side per <br /> Sheets S2.1 and A2.1. The following comments should be addressed: <br /> a) Structural calculations page C-25 indicates the wall piers are 2.2-feet long. At least one <br /> pier in each bay is limited to 2 feet. The calculations should be revised considering the <br /> actual length. <br /> b) Continuing with the previous comment, the calculation of the holdown force is based on the <br /> gross wall length. The placement of the holdowns significantly reduces the moment arm <br /> and increased the required tension force, especially for the side with the (4)-stud boundary <br /> element per Detail 12/S4.2. The holdown force should be revised. <br /> 17.The orthogonal shear walls at the southwest corner of the structural appear to share a <br /> holdown per the foundation plan on Sheet S2.1. The holdown is positioned to provide direct <br /> resistance for the south wall. A detail should be provided for the corner condition <br /> substantiating the load path for the west wall to the holdown. See IBC Section 107.2.1. <br /> 18.The following comments should be addressed for the holdown requirements in Detail 10/S12: <br /> a) The straps in the wall-to-wall configuration do not include the 1 1/2-inch nailing offset <br /> before the "A"dimension. The detail should be revised. See IBC Section 104.11.2, or IBC <br /> Section 2306.1 and AWC NDS-15 Table 12.5.1A. <br /> b) The lower strap in the wall-to-header configuration does not clearly specify the"A" <br /> dimension and 1 '/2-inch offset. Revise the detail as needed to clarify the installation <br /> requirements. See IBC Section 107.2.1. <br /> 19. Structural calculation pages C-25 through C-27 indicate that the first story shear walls on the <br /> north elevation consist of three piers at each unit. The foundation plan should provide a <br /> holdown at each end of each wall. See IBC Sections 1604.1, 1604.8.1, 1604.10, and 2306.1, <br /> and NDS-15 SDPWS Sections 3.4, 4.1.4, and 4.3.6.4.2. <br /> 20.The structural calculations do not appear to include the design of the diaphragms. Calculations <br /> substantiating the diaphragm design shall be submitted for review. See IBC Sections 1604.1, <br /> 1613, and 2306.1. The design shall consider the following: <br /> a) Note 3 on Sheets S2.2 through S2.4 states that the sheathing is oriented perpendicular to <br /> the supporting framing. The plans includes areas where the framing is oriented in two <br /> directions. The design shall consider the limiting capacity resulting from the sheathing <br /> oriented both perpendicular and parallel to the framing. See the configuration cases in <br /> AWC SDPWS-15 Table 4.2A. <br /> b) The structure has a Type 4 Horizontal Structural Irregularity and Type 4 Vertical Structural <br /> Irregularity per ASCE 7-10 Tables 12.3-1 and 12.3-2, respectively. The loads in the <br /> diaphragms shall be increased by 25% per ASCE 7-10 Section 12.3.3.4 Item 1. <br /> c) Collectors shall be provided where required. The loads in the diaphragms shall be increased <br /> by 25% per ASCE 7-10 Section 12.3.3.4 Item 1. <br /> 21.The shearwall holdown design has not been provided in the structural calculations. The <br /> earthquake component of the holdown forces exceeds 20% of the total uplift. The earthquake <br /> component shall be increased per the provisions of ACI 318-14 Section 17.2.3.4.3. <br /> Calculations substantiating the holdown design should be submitted for review. See IBC <br /> Section 1901.2. <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> CITY OF EVERETT • 3200 Cedar Street • Everett, WA 98201 • (425) 257-8810 • Fax (425) 257-8: <br />