Laserfiche WebLink
• How the site's proximity to Silver Lake should influence future uses, and <br /> appropriate design and development standards. <br /> • Traffic congestion and circulation, pedestrian circulation and safety, bicycle <br /> safety, and recreational use of public trails in the vicinity of the Property. <br /> • Impacts of future uses on the character of the Silver Lake neighborhood. <br /> • Other matters determined by the City to be appropriate related to the Property and <br /> Silver Lake neighborhood. <br /> 5. There were several public meetings at which future plans for the re-use and <br /> redevelopment of the subject property were discussed, including the following: <br /> • March 6,2013 —The City Council held a public hearing on the interim regulation. <br /> Taylor Development,the property owner,provided testimony about their plans for <br /> the property. <br /> • May 2, 2013 —The Silver Lake Neighborhood organization hosted a conversation <br /> between the community and Taylor Development, attended by approximately 35 <br /> people. <br /> • July 16, 2013 —A Planning Commission public workshop was held at Silver Lake <br /> Elementary School to talk about Taylor Development's proposal for about 100 <br /> townhouse dwellings. <br /> • September 17, 2013 —A second Planning Commission public workshop was held <br /> at Silver Lake Elementary School to talk further about Taylor Development's <br /> proposal. <br /> • January 9, 2014 — The Silver Lake Neighborhood organization hosted a <br /> presentation by City staff about the shoreline permit process. <br /> 6. The City,Taylor Development, and the Silver Lake Neighborhood discussed all of <br /> the elements in the work plan established by Ordinance No. 3314-13, and determined <br /> the following: <br /> a. The use of the property for commercial purposes,with the exception of auto- <br /> oriented uses such as fast food restaurants,banks with drive-up teller stations, <br /> drive-up pharmacies, and espresso stands, does not appear to have enough <br /> market support given the amount of developed and underperforming retail <br /> space in the vicinity,and additional commercial zoning that already exists in <br /> the area. <br /> b. The property owner,Taylor Development,had recently purchased the <br /> property with the intent to consider residential development for the site,rather <br /> than for commercial or mixed use. Taylor Development's own market <br /> feasibility analysis supported the conclusion stated above. <br /> c. Taylor Development proposes townhouses intended for sale to individual <br /> homeowners at a density of approximately 14 dwellings per acre,while most <br /> of the multiple family housing that has been developed in the vicinity is closer <br /> to about 20 dwelling units per acre. Most of the existing multiple family <br /> PC Resolution 14-02 2 <br />