3425 BELL AVE 2023-06-20 - Laserfiche WebLink

• this work, which is not correct. The garage, and the "other building" for each of the two structures to remain, should be shown in both sets of drawings and specified for demolition. The demolition of the infill garage should be shown in the Existing/Demo plans for each building. Both sets should specify the "other building" to remain as being addressed in a separate permit. Work on the building addressed by each permit to fix the exterior and other impacts by removing the infill structure should be included in the associated permit for each building. The set of Plans I submitted have the same Site Plan that specifies that an attached garage was demolished. I can add a separate page for the attached garage demolition. I will make notes on how the units are being processed through different permits 1. The proposed garage is proposed to be converted to a dwelling unit. Please note that while this is considered to be an ADU per the Planning codes, the building is considered to be a separate single-family residence (SFR) per the 2018 IRC. Criteria for ADUs per the IRC do not apply. This unit was never a Garage, like I mentioned I followed the Snohomish Property Taxes page and labeled it Garage. Then Planning mentioned for it to become a Certified Structure, and yes I will use 2018 IRC and apply it as an SFR. 1. The conversion of the garage to a SFR is a change in the use. The construction drawings are required to show all existing construction and verify that it complies with the building code requirements for new construction. Where the existing construction does not satisfy the requirements for new construction, the structure must be modified. There's no change in use I submitted a Non compliance Certification to keep the current use with Planning 1. The non-structural drawings have been prepared using the 2015 IBC. The documents should be revised to comply with the requirements of the 2018 IBC. I will Review and check that everything complies with IRC 2018. 1. The floor plans should clearly distinguish between the Existing/Demo and Proposed Floor plans for each building. Currently, all sheets state "Floor Plans". 2. I will review and make necessary changes. 1. The drawings scales appear to have errors and should be revised. For example, the scales 9 PP p on Sheet A.501 appear to be '/2", not 3/" as stated. I will review and make necessary changes 1. The drawings include conversion of the storage room (2/A1.02) to a playroom (2/A.103). Note that per the available City of Everett and Snohomish County records, the 3/b