My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1818 HOLBROOK AVE B 2023-07-31
>
Address Records
>
HOLBROOK AVE
>
1818
>
1818 HOLBROOK AVE B 2023-07-31
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 1:24:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 1:22:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HOLBROOK AVE
Street Number
1818
Unit
B
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S <br /> 41111 <br /> LONGITUDE <br /> ONE TWENTY° <br /> ENGINEERING&DESIGN <br /> 3.) Continuing with the previous comment,the deck framing in the Southeast corner appears to be <br /> built without permits. Deck framing should be specified on the plans and shown as new <br /> framing. See Section R507 for requirements of exterior decks.See General Comment and <br /> Architectural Comment 1 for more information. <br /> a. Structural calculations should be submitted for the deck framing and supporting <br /> members. <br /> Response:Existing low profile deck and components have been updated to be shown on the plans. <br /> Deck has not been impacted by remodel. Existing partial plans of deck with verified calculations <br /> have been provided. <br /> b. Details should be provided showing the shear transfer and all framing/support <br /> connections. <br /> Response: Existing low profile deck and components have been updated to be shown on the plans. <br /> Deck has not been impacted by remodel. Existing partial plans of deck with verified calculations <br /> have been provided. <br /> 4.) See Sheet S-4 and Page 10 of the structural calculations. It appears that Beam FB-2 does not <br /> match the structural calculations.A 5.5"x 7.25"glulam beam is specified in the calculations, <br /> but plans call for(3)2x10. It is not clear if the two FB-2 beams meet at an existing beam or <br /> spans through the existing beam. If beam is connected to the existing beam,then plans should <br /> specify hanger or connection.The existing beam should be designed for any additional loads. <br /> Response: Please reference updated plans. Beam FB-2 has been updated to coordinate with <br /> calculations. <br /> 5.) See Sheet S-5. It appears that the fireplace is being removed and replaced with a new full <br /> s o , fireplace <br /> penetratespanningbeam the roofper and the extendsnoteon Sheet aboveS-5.the framing.Based n Thea existingstreetview framingofthe appearshousethe to not be <br /> supported by Beam RB-1 as shown,which is located at the center of the roof penetration. Plans <br /> should provide a detail showing how the roof will be infilled and how the existing framing will <br /> be supported by Beam RB-1. <br /> Response: Detail 14/sd-2 has been cut to show how the new framing will interact at the revised <br /> conditions. Please see detail 14/SD-2. <br /> I- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.