My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1818 HOLBROOK AVE B 2023-07-31
>
Address Records
>
HOLBROOK AVE
>
1818
>
1818 HOLBROOK AVE B 2023-07-31
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 1:24:16 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 1:22:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HOLBROOK AVE
Street Number
1818
Unit
B
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br /> « • • <br /> i <br /> LONGITUDE <br /> ONE TWENTY° <br /> ENGINEERING&DESIGN <br /> 10.) See Sheet S-2 and structural calculations. Structural calculations show several beams and <br /> supporting posts with large reactions. Calculations should be provided showing that the existing <br /> footings are adequate for the reactions. Note that some supports are spaced close and should <br /> be taken into consideration for example,supports for Beam RB-1, FB-2, and FB-4. <br /> response. i no post reactions au all within the conservative bearing capacity of the existing exterior <br /> continuous footing capacity. Conservatively, it can be analyzed that the continuous footing with a <br /> minimum 2ft stemwall condition, will have an equivalent bearing area of 1'-6"x4'-6". Considering a <br /> conservative minimum bearing capacity (per IBC) of 1500psf, this results in a max point load <br /> bearing capacity= 1.5ft*4.5ft*1500 = 10.1 kips. Per calculations, it can be seen that all point loads <br /> are within 5%of bearing capacity.Thus existing footings are sufficient.Please reference calculation <br /> for 1'-6"x4'-6"footing for reference. <br /> 11.) See Sheet S-2 and S-3. It appears that(2)shear walls are being added to the first floor. Plans <br /> should include a footing/support below these walls. <br /> Response: Walls as noted have been revised to avoid confusion. These walls are not considered <br /> to be shearwalls The note was meant to reference the shearwall table as the typical wall framing <br /> information was also listed here. These walls are to be typical 2x stud walls @ 16" o.c. without <br /> sheathing. <br /> Based on a conversation that you have had with Mans previously, we anticipate that these comment <br /> responses will be more clear to the intent of the drawings. If you have any further questions or required <br /> clarification, please contact Mans or myself for further information. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Kenny Jones, PE Mans Thurfjell, PE <br /> L120 Engineering and Design L120 Engineering and Design <br /> Kirkland:425-636-3313 <br /> Dallas:214-429-3956 <br /> •_•�a THURL'•• <br /> ✓ •• <br /> ! r <br /> • <br /> �• I tj <br /> •♦ SfONAL 'N♦♦ <br /> • ■ ■ • •• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.