Laserfiche WebLink
The comments below were generated from this project's City of Everett Stormwater Reviewers. All questions shall be routed through this project's Public <br />Works Reviewer with City of Everett Permit Services. <br /># Document Sht/Pg Reviewer's Comment Designer's Response Initials <br />1 SSP Backwater Include a labels for the lettered pipes in the downstream Noted - labels are included in Appendix C. CWC <br />Calculations map. <br />2 SSP MGS What do the structures "outfall" and "Null" represent? "NULL" Is a modeling placeholder for the CWC <br />Calculations These are large structures, but I'm not sure how they pre -developed condition to represent the <br />impact the stormwater design. proposed stormwater treatment vault. In <br />the post -developed condition, "NULL" is <br />replaced with "TREATMENT" <br />3 SSP Is there any concern that very high tides/storm surge will A tideflex checkmate check valve will be CWC <br />impact trees with salt water? Record high tide is well above added downstream of the treatment vault. <br />the outlet IE of the Filterra device. Include a backwater <br />valve or ensure (with note on plans) that the selected tree <br />species is tolerant of occasional saltwater inundation. <br />(Downstream analysis did not indicate a tidegate at outfall. <br />If there is one this comment can be ignored.) <br />4 SSP WQ sizing Please connect the dots from design WQ flow rate to facility Noted - Section 7.6 of the stormwater CWC <br />sizing. I was not able to locate a description of the required report has been revised to verify the oil <br />treatment footprint or facility capacity other than a control design sizing rate. <br />statement that the treatment vault flow rate is 0.069 CFS in <br />the text. There is no way to verify that the oil control <br />design rate was used, etc. A sizing letter from the <br />manufacturer is also acceptable as long as it states the <br />design assumptions. <br />5 Plans C3.01 Existing CB in SE corner of site is noted to be raised to The catch basin and associated pipe will CWC <br />grade and solid lid. Why not remove as this does not be difficult to demolish as there are a <br />appear to be junction or serve any purpose. number of active existing utilities in close <br />proximity on either side of the structure <br />and around the existing pipe. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />