1033 TEMPLE DR 2023-12-29 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Jonathan Rempel Plan Check Number: B2006-005, First Building Review July 15, 2020 3. The submitted sketches are not sufficient for a complete review to be performed. The sketches are not Construction -level documents. Review comments have been provided to assist in revising the construction drawings. However, these are intended to provide a preliminary review only. Additional Comments may be provided pending a review of the revised submittal documents. The construction drawings should be revised to dearly show the intended construction. See IRC Section 106.1.1. Noted omissions included but are not limited to: a. Clear plans and elevations for the proposed project, including all plan and elevation dimensions. b. Sections and detail references should be provided on the plans and elevations. Note that the location of the "Vertical Cross Section" on Sheet C-1 is not clear and does not appear consistent with the plans on Sheet A-2. c. Specification of all framing members. The grades and sizes for all framing should be specified. d. Specification of preservative -treated or naturally durable framing where required. e. Details for the connections between framing. The size, weather -protection (e.g., galvanizing, etc.), and number of generic fasteners should be specified. The make and model of proprietary hardware, including the size and number of fasteners, should be provided. Minimum spacing, and end and edge distances for fasteners should be specified. I. Sections and details for the foundations. 4. The submitted drawings have not been drawn to -scale. See notes on Sheet A-1 and C-1 for examples. In addition, the project includes portions that are distorted and cannot be clearly understood, such as the roof peak in the "Vertical Cross Section" on Sheet C-1. Revised scaled drawings should be submitted for review. See the Residential Construction Submittal Checklist provided in Permit Services portion of the City of Everett website: httos://everettwa.eov/DocumentCenter/View/117/Residential-construction-submittal-checklist-PDF 5. The proposed drawings do not appear consistent with the existing construction of the building. See IRC Section 106.1.1. Revised drawings that accurately depict the existing and proposed construction should be submitted for review. Demolition drawings showing the existing conditions should be included. The revisions should include, but are not limited to: a. The existing building footprint is not consistent between the two levels. b. The existing and new construction should be clearly delineated. Note that appears the intended construction may be to change many or all of the interior walls on the Main Floor. The bearing walls in the building should be identified. a The Snohomish County Assessor indicates that the basement is unfinished. All construction should be identified as new. d. The east side of the Basement level appears to include above -grade exterior windows and doors. However, this side of the basement is below -grade. 6. The proposed project includes converting the basement into a new dwelling unit. Each dwelling unit is required to have egress access to a public way. The presumed exterior door on the east side appears to open into a hillside. The design should be clarified. Where new retaining walls are required, they should be shown on the plans. Details and calculations for the design of the walls should be submitted for review per IRC Section R301.1.3. The egress door should be provided with an exterior landing J per Section R311.3. See IRC Section ion 106.1.1. dar evereUeps@evere wa. CO� Eve e e WA 88201 425.257.8957 fax ever ttwa.gov/perm is gov Pne2d4