5900 36TH AVE W B SOUNDVIEW EVERETT 2024-08-09

• • EVERETT August 4, 2022 WASHINGTON Randy Brown Randy.brown@synthesispllc.com 12503 NE Bel-Red Road, STE 100 Bellevue,WA 98003 Owner: Bridge Point Everett 500, LLC Project Address: 5900 36th Ave W, Bldg B Plan Check No: B2204-050 RE: Building Permit Review Letter Dear Randy, In response to the application for a building permit,the plans have been examined and you are advised that revisions may be necessary before a permit can be issued. Please review and respond to the comments below. ARCHITECTURAL 1. The allocation of electric vehicle parking stalls appears to be missing from the plan set. Please note that 10% of parking stalls are required to have electrical vehicle which has been updated from the previous requirement of 5%. IBC 429.2. 2. On Sheet G1.1, please also clarify if an S1 occupancy is being proposed as well. While this is proposed as an unlimited area building,the S-1 occupancy listed (in Building Code Item D. 1), it doesn't appear to be listed in as a proposed occupancy in Item A. Please clarify. STRUCTURAL 1. On Sheet S1.0,the lateral force resisting system is identified as Special Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls. Please confirm. Also, please confirm that Special Steel Concentrically Braced Frames are also being utilized as a lateral force resisting system and that the systems are being designed in accordance with ASCE 7-16 Sec 12.2.3.3. 2. The load cases being proposed for the analysis and sizing of the braced frame columns, beams, and their connections are unclear on pages L-21, L-22,and L- PERMIT SERVICES 23. From AISC 341-16 Sec F2.3a, on page L-21,the expected tension force and 9 3200 Cedar Street the expected compression force would be (2) different values applied Everett,WA 98201 concurrently. The value of 163 kips does not appear to be the expected tension force of the brace of nor the expected compression value of the brace. On L- e 425.257.8810 21, per AISC 341-16 Sec F2.3b,the brace values of 163 kips does not appear to 425.257.8857 fax correspond to the expected tension force of the brace nor the expected post- everetteps@everettwa.gov buckling compression load of the brace. On L-23,the load case appears to "' everettwa.gov/permits i indicate that overstrength is being used. The analysis of an SCBF system are the cases indicated per AISC 341 Sec F2.3. It is unclear how overstrength is being applied given the design cases of L-21 and L-22. Please clarify. Page1of3