Laserfiche WebLink
The comments below were generated from this project's City of Everett Industrial Pretreatment Reviewer. All questions shall be routed through this project's <br />Public Works Reviewer Thad Newport with City of Everett Permit Services (TNewport@everettwa.gov). <br /># <br />Document <br />Sht/Pg <br />Reviewer's Comment <br />Designer's Response <br />Initials <br />is provided with this submittal. The proposed berm would result <br />from the south edge flows to the existing <br />in ponding stormwater because the surrounding grades are very <br />storm and will not enter the sanitary sewer. <br />flat. <br />As far as ponding along the west island <br />City Comment: The current berm in place at the west fuel island <br />edge, that is an existing condition. Based on <br />is not sufficient to prevent stormwater from outside of the <br />spot elevations from the topographic survey <br />concrete pad from entering the catch basins located within the <br />the asphalt berm is tall enough to prevent <br />fuel island area. Currently, the berm does not enclose the pad, <br />stormwater from flowing onto the pad. Any <br />with the southern end left open. only exists at the southern end <br />ponding of water east of the berm is a <br />of the pad. The berm must be expanded/redone to fully <br />private drainage issue. Shallow ponding in <br />encompass the entire pad to prevent any stormwater from <br />asphalt (bird bath) is very common and a <br />outside of the pad from entering the catch basins. It has been <br />nuance issue for the user and not regulated <br />observed that the current berm is not sufficient to control the <br />by City Codes. Revising the parking lot <br />drainage area of the concrete pad, or to prevent flow from <br />grades to resolve ponding is only necessary <br />outside of it from entering it. If ponding is expected to be an <br />if the private property owner wants to fix <br />issue, the designer must find a way to direct ponded stormwater <br />the surface ponding, which is not the case. <br />outside of the bermed area to the stormwater system. <br />The existing berms were not shown on <br />Additionally, the designer proposes to send a tributary area of <br />Previous plans. They have been added to <br />6600 square feet to the sanitary sewer from this area. The only <br />the revised plans. The existing berms direct <br />area that will be allowed to enter the sanitary sewer is within the <br />stormwater around the island pad, so only <br />bermed area beneath the existing canopy (approximately 1500 <br />the 1,500 SF pad drains to the sanitary <br />square feet). All other areas outside of this must be directed to <br />sewer. The existing asphalt berms <br />the stormwater system. <br />addresses the City's comment. No <br />additional work is required. <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />