Laserfiche WebLink
4. There is a twelve-foot grade difference between the site's high end on the west <br /> property line and the low elevation off 32nd Street. This is an extraordinary <br /> circumstance relating to topography that warrants the grant of the variance. <br /> (findings 11 and 12) <br /> 5. The variance will grant the owner of the subject property the same general rights <br /> enjoyed by other property owners in the same area. (finding 13) <br /> 6. The variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property general <br /> development rights. (finding 14) <br /> 7. The grant of the variance is consistent with the goals and polices of the Everett <br /> General Plan. The project is being built pursuant to standards of the BMU zone <br /> which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (finding 15) <br /> 8. The variance is not the result of a self-created hardship but is the result of <br /> extraordinary circumstances as set forth above. (finding 16) <br /> Access off 32nd Street Variance Conclusions <br /> 1. In addition to access from the alley, the Applicant seeks a variance to permit a <br /> driveway approach off 32nd Street. Although a variance is requested, the criteria <br /> for review is set forth in EMC 13.16.110. (findings 1 and 17) <br /> 2. The requested variance for the driveway off 32nd Street arises from peculiar <br /> physical differences not ordinarily existing in similar districts or due to the nature <br /> of the businesses and the site itself. Because of the elevated west end of the <br /> site being significantly at a higher elevation than the east end and the need for <br /> parking to meet the development standards for residential and commercial use at <br /> the site, there are special physical conditions that necessitate the grant of the <br /> variance. (findings 11 and 19) <br /> 3. The requested variance is not against the public interest, particularly safety, <br /> convenience and general welfare. It provides an alternative for access to the <br /> proposed structure and allows for three parking levels to accommodate parking <br /> needs that are more than satisfied by the proposal. (findings 19 and 20) <br /> 4. The grant of the variance will not adversely affect the rights of adjacent property <br /> owners or tenants. (finding 21) <br /> 5. The second access will improve vehicular access to the building for tenants and <br /> will reduce maneuverability problems within the structure itself. (finding 22) <br />