My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3618 W MUKILTEO BLVD SITE WORK FOR HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES 2025-10-27
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
3618
>
SITE WORK FOR HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES
>
3618 W MUKILTEO BLVD SITE WORK FOR HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES 2025-10-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2025 11:03:45 AM
Creation date
6/17/2025 11:22:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
3618
Tenant Name
SITE WORK FOR HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
572
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Mukilteo Boulevard Development <br />Everett, Washington <br />March 31, 2003 <br />NGA File No. 366503 <br />Page 4 <br />outwash. Fill material was encountered in one of the explorations. <br />Explorations: The subsurface conditions were explored at the site on March 19, 2003 by excavating <br />eleven test pits to depths of 4.2 to 14.2 feet below the existing ground surface using a backhoe. The <br />explorations were located in the field by an NGA engineer who also examined the soils and geologic <br />conditions encountered and maintained logs of the test pits. <br />The approximate locations of our explorations are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The soils were <br />visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System, presented as Figure <br />3. The logs of our explorations are presented as Figures 4 through 6. We present a brief summary of the <br />subsurface conditions in the following paragraphs. For a more detailed description of the site soils, the <br />test pit logs should be reviewed. <br />Our subsurface explorations encountered a surficial layer of topsoil 0.9 to 2.1 feet thick. The subsurface <br />soils were highly variable, not only between different test pit locations but also in individual explorations. <br />Typically, the test pits encountered several different layers of soil approximately each layer was two to <br />four .feet in thickness. The different soil types included: silty fine to medium sand with fine gravel, silt, <br />silty fine to medium sand, silty fine sand, silty fine sand with occasional gravel pockets, silt with fine <br />sand, silt with fine to medium sand, silty fine to coarse sand with fine gravel, silty fine sand/sandy silt, <br />fine sand, medium to coarse sand, silty fine to coarse sand with gravel, and medium to coarse sand with <br />gravel and cobbles. We have interpreted these materials as glacial drift and recessional outwash. <br />In Test Pit 11, the topsoil was underlain by loose silty fine to medium sand, evaluated as fill, which <br />extended to a depth of 2.8 feet. A layer of buried topsoil, 0.2 feet thick, was observed below the fill soils. <br />The materials we observed beneath the buried topsoil were generally more granular and less moisture - <br />sensitive than the soils encountered in the other explorations. These included: silty fine to medium sand, <br />silty fine to coarse sand with gravel, medium to coarse sand with gravel and cobbles, and fine sand. <br />Hydrologic Conditions:, Slight ground water seepage was encountered in Test Pits 2, 3, 4, 5, and 9. This <br />seepage was encountered above relatively impermeable materials, and is interpreted to be perched ground <br />water. <br />Perched ground water occurs when surface water infiltrates through more permeable, near -surface soils, <br />NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />EXHIBIT #_� <br />PAGE %nF Z/Y/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.