My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
304 SE EVERETT MALL WAY PANERA BREAD 2025-07-25
>
Address Records
>
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
>
304
>
PANERA BREAD
>
304 SE EVERETT MALL WAY PANERA BREAD 2025-07-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2025 1:18:35 PM
Creation date
7/25/2025 1:17:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
Street Number
304
Tenant Name
PANERA BREAD
Notes
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Panera Bread Stormwater Management Report Everett,WA <br /> • There are no small depressions on site that retain stormwater runoff <br /> • Since nearly the entire existing site is either pavement or building structures and no <br /> significant existing infiltration to consider, there are no depths or conditions of the <br /> soil profile that influence the existing or proposed conditions of the site. <br /> The following site design strategies were considered since Minimum Requirement#5 must be <br /> met on the project site: <br /> 1. There is no duff layer, native topsoil, and natural vegetation present to retain on this <br /> project site. <br /> 2. While no natural stormwater features are present on the existing site to retain,the <br /> project proposes to maintain the existing stormwater management concept. <br /> 3. The predevelopment flow path lengths and drainage patterns were maintained <br /> whenever possible. <br /> 4. Distances for overland flow were kept short wherever possible to promote sheet <br /> flow and minimize concentration of runoff. <br /> 5. The designed stormwater management system was kept as close to its origin as <br /> possible. <br /> 6. There were no areas of permeable soils or natural depression areas to consider. <br /> 7. Due to the small size of the site (less than one acre)there were no feasible areas to <br /> act as bioretention areas to capture, store, and infiltrate stormwater on site. <br /> 8. The parking lot and other proposed site features were designed to follow the site's <br /> topographic contours in order to minimize cuts and fills. <br /> 9. The amount of impervious area of the site-was decreased. <br /> 10. Due to the small size of the project site, utilizing vegetated open spaces or <br /> bioretention areas was not possible. <br /> 11. Due to the small size of the project site, directing rooftop runoff to infiltration areas, <br /> bioretention areas, or full dispersion systems to evaporate and transpire stormwater <br /> was not possible. <br /> 12. Impervious surfaces were reduced as much as possible. <br /> 13. Pervious paving surfaces were not practical for this site. <br /> 14. Soil Amendments (Option 2 per the City of Everett Stormwater Management <br /> Manual, Volume Ill, Chapter 12 BMP 12.20)to establish soil quality and depth, have <br /> been implemented into the construction plans. <br /> Core States Group Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.