Laserfiche WebLink
Everett Housing Authority JN 12080 <br /> May 16,2012 Page 12 <br /> ii <br /> need to remove the fill to achieve the required compaction. The following table presents <br /> recommended relative compactions for structural fill: <br /> LOCATION OF FILL 1ENIMUM RELATIVE <br /> PLAC ENIENT COI\IP.<1CTIO N <br /> Beneath footings, slabs 95% <br /> or walkwa s <br /> Filled slopes and behind 90% <br /> retainin• walls <br /> 95%for upper 12 inches of <br /> Beneath pavements subgrade;90% below that <br /> level <br /> Where: Minimum Relative Compaction is the ratio,expressed in <br /> percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry <br /> density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test <br /> Designation D 1557-91(Modified Proctor). <br /> Structural fill that will be placed in wet weather should consist of a coarse, granular soil with a silt or <br /> clay content of no more than 5 percent. The percentage of particles passing the No. 200 sieve <br /> should be measured from that portion of soil passing the three-quarter-inch sieve. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as <br /> they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions <br /> encountered in the test borings are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the <br /> subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those <br /> observed in our explorations, we should be advised at once so that we can review these conditions <br /> and reconsider our recommendations where necessary. Unanticipated soil conditions are <br /> commonly encountered on construction sites and cannot be fully anticipated by merely taking soil <br /> samples in test borings. Subsurface conditions can also vary between exploration locations. Such <br /> unexpected conditions frequently require making additional expenditures to attain a properly <br /> constructed project. It is recommended that the owner consider providing a contingency fund to <br /> accommodate such potential extra costs and risks. This is a standard recommendation for all <br /> projects. <br /> This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Everett Housing Authority and its <br /> representatives, for specific application to this project and site. Our recommendations and <br /> conclusions are based on observed site materials and engineering analyses. Our conclusions and <br /> recommendations are professional opinions derived in accordance with current standards of <br /> practice within the scope of our services and within budget and time constraints. No warranty is <br /> expressed or implied. The scope of our services does not include services related to construction <br /> safety precautions, and our recommendations are not intended to direct the contractor's methods, <br /> techniques, sequences, or procedures, except as specifically described in our report for <br /> consideration in design. Our services also do not include assessing or minimizing the potential for <br /> biological hazards, such as mold, bacteria, mildew and fungi in either the existing or proposed site <br /> development. <br /> GEOTECH CONSULTANTS,INC. <br />