2309 PINE ST 2025-08-21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Sukhmeet S. Birk American Eagles Management Services, LLC Plan Check Number: BW2004-004, Second Building Review August 13, 2020 4. Foundation Detail 6/S-2.0 specifies a minimum clearance of 6 inches between the soil and top - of -concrete. This places the structural wall sheathing and floor framing within 8 inches of exposed soil. The framing should be specified as naturally -durable or preservative -treated wood. Alternatively, the clearance should be increased to 8 inches. Details in the architectural sheets should be similarly revised for consistency. See IBC Section 2304.12.1.2. 5. Continuing with the previous comment, the drawings should specify that cuts and holes in preservative -treated wood should be coated with a preservative treatment compying with APWA 4. See Section R317. 6. The plans appear to be missing new headers, beams, and posts throughout the building. The framing plans should be revised to show the entire load path. Connections should be specified. Calculations substantiating the design of all framing and connections should be submitted for review. See IBC Sections 1604.1 and 1604.4. 7. Continuing with the previous comment, the project appears to require proprietary hardware (e.g., framing connections, post -installed anchors, etc.). The construction drawings should specify the make and model for each type of proprietary connection. Fastening requirements (e.g., nail sizes and count, etc.) should be specified for each component where applicable. See IBC Sections 107.2.1 and 1604.1. 8. The Existing Roof Framing Plan on Sheet 4 indicates an existing (3)2x6 beam supporting part of the existing roof and new overframing. The beam appears to have a span of up to 16 feet. Calculations should be submitted evaluating the beam, supporting posts and foundations, and associated connections. The evaluation should consider current snow loading requirements. The 2x6 pieces should be considered as individual members (i.e., no restraint against lateral - torsional buckling) unless details are provided demonstrating interconnection to provide composite performance. See IBC Sections 1604.1 and 1604.4. 9. The typical wall construction shown in Detail 1/S-1.0 is incomplete. Omissions include but are not limited to king and jack stud requirements. See Section R602. 10. Detail 1/S-2.0 shows the construction of the gable ends. The construction does not appear structurally adequate to support the required construction live and snow loads. The detail does not provide structural support for the cantilevering sheathing. The details should be revised. Calculations substantiating the design should be submitted for review. See IBC Sections 107.2.1, 1603.1, 1604.4, and Table 1607.1. 11. The shear wall schedule on Sheet S-2.0 specifies 3/8-inch sheathing. The structural calculations indicate 15/32-inch sheathing is required. The drawings should be revised. See IBC Section 107.2.1 and 1604.2. 12. The locations of the shear walls and holdowns are not specified in the plans. The extent of the shear walls should be shown. The locations of holdowns should be specified where required. Holdowns are required unless substantiated with calculations to not be required. The calculations should consider overturning in each individual wall pier unless the walls are 3200 Cedar Street © 425.257.8810 O everetteps@everettwa.gov Everett, WA 98201 425.257.8857 fax everettwa.gov/permits Page 3 of 4