My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3620 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2025-08-13
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
3620
>
Geotech Report
>
3620 W MUKILTEO BLVD Geotech Report 2025-08-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 9:20:08 AM
Creation date
8/13/2025 9:19:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
3620
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br /> • Mukilteo Boulevard Development <br /> Everett,Washington <br /> March 31,2003 <br /> NGA File No. 366503 <br /> Page 4 <br /> outwash. Fill material was encountered in one of the explorations. <br /> Explorations: The subsurface conditions were explored at the site on March 19, 2003 by excavating <br /> eleven test pits to depths of 4.2 to 14.2 feet below the existing ground surface using a backhoe. The <br /> explorations were located in the field by an NGA engineer who also examined the soils and geologic <br /> conditions encountered and maintained logs of the test pits. <br /> The approximate locations of our explorations are shown on the Site Plan in Figure 2. The soils were <br /> visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System,presented as Figure <br /> 3. The logs of our explorations are presented as Figures 4 through 6. We present a brief summary of the <br /> subsurface conditions in the following paragraphs. For a more detailed description of the site soils, the <br /> test pit logs should be reviewed. <br /> Our subsurface explorations encountered a surficial layer of topsoil 0.9 to 2.1 feet thick. The subsurface <br /> soils were highly variable,not only between different test pit locations but also in individual explorations. <br /> Typically, the test pits encountered several different layers of soil approximately each layer was two to <br /> four feet in thickness. The different soil types included: silty fine to medium sand with fine gravel, silt, <br /> silty fine to medium sand, silty fine sand, silty fine sand with occasional gravel pockets, silt with fine <br /> sand, silt with fine to medium sand, silty fine to coarse sand with fine gravel, silty fine sand/sandy silt, <br /> fine sand, medium to coarse sand, silty fine to coarse sand with gravel, and medium to coarse sand with <br /> gravel and cobbles. We have interpreted these materials as glacial drift and recessional outwash. <br /> In Test Pit 11, the topsoil was underlain by loose silty fine to medium sand, evaluated as fill, which <br /> extended to a depth of 2.8 feet. A layer of buried topsoil, 0.2 feet thick,was observed below the fill soils. <br /> The materials we observed beneath the buried topsoil were generally more granular and less moisture- <br /> sensitive than the soils encountered in the other explorations. These included: silty fine to medium sand, <br /> silty fine to coarse sand with gravel,medium to coarse sand with gravel and cobbles, and fine sand. <br /> Hydrologic Conditions:,Slight ground water seepage was encountered in Test Pits 2,3,4,5,and 9. This <br /> seepage was encountered above relatively impermeable materials,and is interpreted to be perched ground <br /> water. <br /> Perched ground water occurs when surface water infiltrates through more permeable, near-surface soils, <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES,INC. <br /> EXHIBIT # l J <br /> PAGE 7OF Z4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.