My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3702 W MUKILTEO BLVD HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES 2025-08-13
>
Address Records
>
W MUKILTEO BLVD
>
3702
>
HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES
>
3702 W MUKILTEO BLVD HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES 2025-08-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2025 1:17:43 PM
Creation date
8/13/2025 1:14:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MUKILTEO BLVD
Street Number
3702
Tenant Name
HARBORS EDGE TOWNHOMES
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
each lot. The site plans show the drive aisle entering at the site entrance as 26 feet in <br /> width and its width varying throughout the interior of the site,narrowing to 20 feet at the <br /> narrowest point. Its final configuration would be required to meet private drive Standard • <br /> C. Exhibits 1 and 3, Sheet C 3.0. • <br /> 11. Currently the site's frontage on W. Mukilteo Boulevard includes a paved street but no <br /> sidewalk and curb. Planning Staff submitted that the standard minimum sidewalk width <br /> required along the frontage would six feet but noted that public sidewalk standards may <br /> be modified by the City Engineer per EMC 19.33.050.D. The Applicant would be <br /> required to improve the site's Mukilteo Boulevard frontage to meet city standards as <br /> determined by the City Engineer. Exhibit 1. <br /> 12. The City code requires off-street parking for multifamily units outside Metro Everett at <br /> the rate of two paved stalls for three-bedroom(or more)units, provided that that unit lots <br /> comprised of two-to four-unit attached dwellings that take access from an easement and <br /> do not front a public street are required to provide three spaces per unit. EMC 19.34.025 <br /> Table 34-2. Based on the site plan's proposed building configuration,the project would <br /> require 65 off-street parking spaces, two per unit fronting the public street and three per <br /> unit not fronting the public street(Lots 11 through 25). In the documents submitted at <br /> hearing, the project provided two parking spaces within each unit's garage with driveway <br /> space in front of each unit. Staff noted that the driveway space in front of many (if not <br /> all)units is not deep enough to provide dimensionally compliant parking. Staff had <br /> initially recommended that a parking modification would be required to be granted prior <br /> to final plat approval. However, at hearing,Planning Staff testified that, based on the <br /> Planning Department's interpretation of EMC 19.34.025 Table 34-2, units in buildings <br /> containing five or more units only require two parking spaces when accessed by a private <br /> drive.2 Staff stated that if the townhomes on Lots 11 through 25 were arranged in two <br /> buildings instead of four,each unit would only require two stalls. The Applicant <br /> representative indicated that a reconfiguration of the units was being considered. In the <br /> requested reconsideration,the Applicant confirmed the intention to combine the units on <br /> Lots 11 through 25 into two buildings. The parties submitted that, based on such a <br /> reconfiguration, 50 parking stalls are required for the 25 townhomes. Of note, the code <br /> does not require guest parking to be provided over and above the minimum parking per <br /> unit. Four guest parking spaces are provided near the southeast corner of the project. <br /> Exhibits 1, 3 (Sheet C3.0), 38, and 39. <br /> 13. Applicable multifamily development standards require a five-foot wide exterior <br /> pedestrian circulation system for the proposed development. EMC 19.09.030.A. The <br /> 2 Planning Staff explained the basis for this position as follows:"If all units in the development were in buildings <br /> that are comprised of S or more dwelling units,the off-street parking ratio would be required per Table 34-2 under <br /> EMC 19.34.025,regardless of whether the units were accessed from a private access drive or not(see Table 34-1 for <br /> `dwelling,multiple family). Per definition under EMC 19.04.050,`dwelling,multiple-family'means a buildings) <br /> or portion of a building arranged or designed to be occupied by five or more families living independently of each <br /> other.The ratio of off-street parking for`dwelling,2-4 unit attached'(3 per unit where access is from a private <br /> drive)would no longer be applicable." Exhibit 39. <br /> Everett Hearing Examiner <br /> Findings, Conclusion, and Decision <br /> Sage Homes Northwest LLC(REV1122-001) page 6 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.