KLB Construction, LLC 4/21/2026 (4)

Addendum 4 Page 6 CITY OF EVERETT  3200 Cedar Street  Everett, WA 98201  (425) 257-8800  Fax (425) 257-8882 Only flaggers by the hour are paid in Bid Item 105. All other costs, including traffic control supervision, set up and take down are in Bid Item 2. Q9 - Please confirm any BNSF flagging cost is to be paid by City of Everett. Confirmed. Q10 - Plan page C-2109 Sta 48+58.12 and 49+05.83 can you confirm that these are both 45-degree bends? On C-2109, the FRP fittings at STA 48+58.12 and 49+05.83 are required to meet the vertical change in alignment based on the change in slope provided. Q11 - Plan page C-2209 Sta 28+01.98 does this connection to existing need a settlement coupling? Per the design drawings, a settlement coupling is not required. SSMH108 is to be installed on piles. Q12 - Plan page C-2309 Starting at Sta. 40+09.25 to the plant connection, can you confirm a total of 3 settlement couplings are required? Settlement couplings are to be provided in accordance with the performance requirements in Section 40 05 07.14 and Key Notes 19 and 20. The transition between FRP and the coupling may be adjusted if required by the lay length of the coupling and fitting for the horizontal bend. Revise the station listed in Paragraph 3.04 SETTLEMENT/SEISMIC JOINT SCHEDULE, Row 1 as follows: C- 2309, STA 40+48.07 40+49.40 (Item 9). Q13 - Please confirm that Key Note 3 on plan sheet C-5001 is incorrect and that the aforementioned emergency overflow is to be 6” diameter as shown on plan sheet C - 5002 (detail-1). See Item 11. Q14 - Section 15.3.9 of 00 72 00 states that All coverages for Subcontractors shall be subject to all the requirements stated herein and applicable to their profession. The majority of small subcontractor businesses do not maintain $2M/$5M in general liability coverage limits, nor do they have $2M in auto liability coverage limits. If the GC doesn’t have an existing captive program, this requirement increases the cost of a possible CCIP for the general liability. CCIPs no longer insure auto policies, it’s no longer even available in the market place to provide auto coverage for subcontractors. Would there be consideration for small subcontractors to provide limits based on their scope of work and contract amount, set forth by the GC since any deficit in the subcontractor’s coverage would be provided by the GC, who is the back stop protection for the City? This would save on insurance costs and still provide the protection the City is seeking. This request would be similar to the changes made to the insurance requirements in the PGSF Rebid.