Laserfiche WebLink
4. In addition to subsection A.3 of this section, within the public comment period, the <br /> director or the city engineer shall be authorized to request an open record hearing to be <br /> held on the proposed alteration or vacation. <br /> 5. If an open record public hearing is requested by any affected person or by the city, the <br /> open record hearing shall proceed as a Review Process III as defined in Title 15 of this <br /> code, as amended. The notification for the scheduled public hearing shall be provided at <br /> least fifteen days prior to the hearing and shall consist of the following: <br /> a. A notice published in a newspaper of general circulation; and <br /> b. Notice shall be mailed to adjacent property owners and property owners of portions <br /> affected that are within the original approved subdivision or short subdivision, and parties <br /> who have provided written comments. <br /> 6. The director is authorized to determine whether language noted on the face of the final <br /> recorded subdivision or short subdivision plat map may constitute a condition for <br /> purposes of a revision or a restrictive covenant for purposes of an alteration. For <br /> purposes of meeting the requirements of this title and RCW 58.17.215, any restrictive <br /> covenant that has not been imposed by the city shall not be subject to the requirements of <br /> this chapter. <br /> B. Integrated Permit Review. <br /> 1. The city shall integrate the SEPA review and the review of all other requested city <br /> land use permits with review of the alteration or vacation application as defined in Title <br /> 15 of this code, as amended. <br /> 2. A final SEPA threshold determination and a decision on all other administrative <br /> project permit decisions will be made concurrently with the alteration or vacation if no <br /> open record public hearing is required or requested. These decisions will be issued in the <br /> form of a notice of decision as provided for in Title 15 of this code, as amended. <br /> 3. If the application includes a request of other permits which require an open record <br /> public hearing, the director and city engineer action on the alteration or vacation <br /> application will be in the form of a recommendation to the hearing examiner and will be <br /> reviewed concurrently at the open record public hearing. All other requested land use <br /> permits will be reviewed concurrently to the extent permissible by law as defined in Title <br /> 15 of this code, as amended. <br /> C. Open Record Public Hearing. The hearing examiner will conduct an open record <br /> public hearing if a hearing has been timely requested. The hearing examiner will create <br /> the record of the alteration or vacation through testimony and submission of evidence and <br /> information in accordance with the procedures defined in Title 15 of this code, as <br /> amended, Chapter 2.23 of this code, as amended, and this title. The open record public <br /> hearing will be held prior to the hearing examiner's decision on the project permit. <br /> D. Approval of Alteration or Vacation Shall Consider the Land Division Evaluation <br /> Criteria and Development Standards in Chapter 18.28. The director and city engineer or <br /> hearing examiner shall evaluate the proposed alteration or vacation application and its <br /> compliance with Chapter 18.28 of this code, all other applicable city ordinances, and city <br /> standards. <br /> E. Decision by the City or Hearing Examiner. <br /> 1. If the director and city engineer or, in the case of a public hearing, the hearing <br /> examiner find that the proposed alteration or vacation complies with Chapter 18.28 of <br /> 16 <br />