Ordinance 2538-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

• Quantity and location of parking for uses subject to Review Process III shall be established during the review process, unless already specified in this title. BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Quantity and location of parking for uses subject to a hearing examiner review processes set forth in the City's Local Project Review Procedures Ordinance shall be established during the review process, unless already specified in this title. SECTION 34: That Ordinance No. 1671-89 as amended by Section 4 of Ordinance 1793-91 and Section 56 of Ordinance No. 2397-99 (EMC 19.34.070 A) which reads in part as follows: A. An applicant may request a modification of the parking requirements of this title. The review authority and review process shall be based upon the following criteria: 1. Uses which are reviewed using Review Process III shall have requests for a modification of parking requirements considered during the review process for that use. 2. Variances requesting a reduction of parking requirements by more than ten percent, which are not being considered concurrently with a use which required Review Process III shall be considered using Review Process IV. 3. Requests for a modification of parking requirements of not more than ten percent may be reviewed by the planning director using Review Process II, subject to the following requirements: a. The planning director may approve a request for such a modification only if such a request is supported by the city traffic engineer,based upon information or documentation contained in a parking analysis, as may be required by the traffic engineer. b. The planning director may not approve a modification of parking standards for residential uses. c. The decision of the planning director on a request to modify parking requirements shall be subject to appeal to the hearing examiner, as provided in Section 41.180. d. In approving a request for a modification to reduce parking standards by not more than ten percent, the planning director shall not be required to make the findings required for variances, described in Chapter 41,but shall issue written findings which are substantiated by the information required by subsection B of this section. BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: A. An applicant may request a modification of the parking requirements of this title. The review authority and review process shall be based upon the following criteria: 1. Uses which are reviewed using a hearing examiner review process as set forth in the City's Local Project Review Procedures Ordinance shall have requests for a modification of parking requirements considered during the review process for that use. 2. Variances requesting a reduction of parking requirements shall be considered using the review processes described in the City's Local Project Review Procedures Ordinance. 26