My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 2859-05
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2859-05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2015 3:38:06 PM
Creation date
3/26/2015 3:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2859-05
Date
8/10/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1 acre (or fraction thereof) of tidal or palustrine habitat for each acre (or fraction <br /> thereof) of palustrine habitat lost to development (see also Regulation 35.A.15). <br /> • 1.3 IVA-acres of habitat function for the limiting taxon (chinook or coho/bull trout) <br /> for each IVA-acre lost. This 30 percent increase in function accounts for uncertainty <br /> in the habitat assessments provided by the model as described above, and is intended <br /> to ensure that the SEWIP goal of a net increase in habitat function is achieved. <br /> Minimum acreage compensation regulations do not apply to habitat restoration and <br /> enhancement projects that are not used for compensatory mitigation. Mitigation credit <br /> for log raft storage restrictions that remove a stressor from a tideflat are only allowed as <br /> mitigation for lost habitat function, not area. Note that loss of riparian function above <br /> OHW should be scored by the model, and should be compensated. <br /> 4. Out-of-Kind Compensation. <br /> • Development impacts to tidal or tidally influenced habitats shall not be compensated <br /> for with palustrine wetland enhancement, restoration, or creation. <br /> • Development impacts to palustrine wetland habitats may be compensated for with <br /> tidal habitat restoration or creation on an acre-for-acre basis. If nontidal mitigation is <br /> proposed for loss of nontidal palustrine wetlands in the SEWIP planning area, it <br /> should be reviewed to ensure that opportunities to recover tidal function would not be <br /> foreclosed. To replace palustrine wetland functions with palustrine wetland <br /> functions, the original SEWIP process and vegetated wetland model applies (City of <br /> Everett et al. 1997). <br /> • The Tidal Habitat Model shall be used to ensure that adequate replacement of <br /> salmonid habitat function is provided (i.e., it is assumed that within the regulations of <br /> SEWIP, the model will provide for replacement of habitat for salmonids, except that <br /> impacts to eelgrass will be evaluated and compensated for in accordance with WDFW <br /> mitigation policies). <br /> • Out-of-kind compensation for the two watershed process-based functions identified in <br /> the Tidal Habitat Model (e.g., LWD recruitment, feeder bluffs) shall be prohibited, <br /> except for cases where tree removal is required for maintenance of the integrity of <br /> functional dikes. <br /> 5. Where Compensation Can Occur. <br /> • Compensation for impacts to vegetated palustrine wetlands may occur within any <br /> EMU, with either created, enhanced, or restored tidal habitat. However, to replace <br /> palustrine wetland functions with palustrine wetland functions, the original SEWIP <br /> process and vegetated wetland model applies See the 1997 SEWIP Regulations after <br /> Regulation 35.A. 15 below. <br /> 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.