My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2414 BAKER AVE 2017-01-13
>
Address Records
>
BAKER AVE
>
2414
>
2414 BAKER AVE 2017-01-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2017 5:08:18 PM
Creation date
11/30/2016 1:53:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
BAKER AVE
Street Number
2414
Notes
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INCLUDED
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tom Eiden J N 101 i 4 <br />June 21, 2010 P�g� � <br />blocks untii the garage basement walls are installed. Similariy, if slope cuts can b2 extended into <br />the alley and all traffic can be kept at least 10 feet from the back of the block wall until the <br />basement walls are installed, Ultra blocks could be used along the western side of the excavation <br />as well. If these restrictions on cut slope easements and traffic surcharges cannot be maintained, <br />cantilevered soldier pile shoring will be necessary. We have provided recommendations for <br />cantilevered soldier piles and Ultra block shoring in this report. <br />The erosion control measures needed during the site development will depend heavily on the <br />weather conditions that are encountered. While site clearing will expose an area of bare soil, the <br />erosion potential on the site is relatively low due to the gentle slope of the ground. We anticipate <br />that a silt fence will be needed around the downslope sides of any cleared areas. Rocked <br />construction access roads should be extended into the site to reduce the amount of soil or mud <br />carried off the property by trucks and equipment. Wherever possible, these roads should follow the <br />alignment of planned pavements, and trucks should not be allowed to drive off of the rock-covered <br />areas. Existing catch basins in, and immediately downslope of, the planned work areas should be <br />protected with pre-manufactured silt socks. Cut slopes and soil stockpiles should be covered with <br />plastic during wet weather. Following rough grading, it may be necessary to mulch or hydroseed <br />bare areas that will not be immediately covered with landscaping or an impervious surface. <br />The drainage and/or waterproofing recommendations presented in this report are intended only to <br />prevent active seepage from flowing through concrete walls or slabs. Even in the absence of active <br />seepage into and beneath structures, water vapor can migrate through walls, slabs, and floors from <br />the surrounding soil, and can even be transmitted from slabs and foundation walls due to the <br />concrete curing process. Water vapor also results from occupant uses, such as cooking and <br />bathing. Excessive water vapor trapped within structures can result in a variety of undesirable <br />conditions, including, but not limited to, moisture problems with flooring systems, excessively moist <br />air within occupied areas, and the growth of molds, fungi, and other biological organisms that may <br />be harmful to the health of the occupants. The designer or architect must consider the potential <br />vapor sources and likely occupant uses, and provide sufficient ventilation, either passive or <br />mechanical, to prevent a build up of excessive water vapor within the planned structure. <br />We recommend including this report, in its entirety, in the project contract documents. This report <br />should also be provided to any future property owners so they will be aware of our findings and <br />recommendations. <br />SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS <br />In accordar�ce with Table 1613.5.2 of the 2006 International Building Code (IBC), the site soil <br />profile within 100 feet of the ground surface is best represented by Soil Profile Type D(Stiff Soil). <br />The site soils are not susceptible to seismic liquefacfion because of their dense nature. <br />CONVENTIONAL FOUNDATIDNS <br />The proposed garage can be supported on conventional foundation bearing on the medium-dense <br />to dense, native, slightly silty sands or on structural fill placed above these competent, native soils. <br />An allowable bearing capacity of 3,000 psf may be assumed. A one-third increase in this ctesign <br />bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term wind or seismic loads. For the above <br />design criteria, it is anticipated that the total post-construction settlement of footings founded on <br />competent, native soil, or on structural fill up to 5 feet in thickness, will be less than one inch, with <br />GEOTECI-I CONSULTnNTS. INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.