My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
510 ALVERSON BLVD 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
ALVERSON BLVD
>
510
>
510 ALVERSON BLVD 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2022 1:12:29 PM
Creation date
1/23/2017 10:20:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ALVERSON BLVD
Street Number
510
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F <br /> , <br /> • 5. The Howard�s will not plant anything that will exceed tho height <br /> of the eix (6) foot fence !f the fence is allowed to remain. <br /> 6. The euck's view ia oriented toward the Sound and not towarAa <br /> tho North and East where the aix (6) foot fence is constructed. <br /> 7. There are other properties in the area that hava tall hedges <br /> between buildinga. <br /> Mr. Huck, tha neighbor to the South, made the followinq statements against the <br /> qranting of the variance. <br /> ( 1. Ha has o�:ned hia propezty eince 1951 and there has been no <br /> Fchange in the contour of the property. <br /> � 2. Ne has no view out of hie Northerly windows becauso of thr, six (6) <br /> foot fence. <br /> Hetty Buck, Mr. Huck's daughter, made the following statements agninst ttie <br /> grantinq of the variance. <br /> � 1. Thoy lived twenty ycars without a fence and see no need for one <br /> now. <br /> 2. Existing plantings act as a natural harrier. <br /> 3. The existing fence hinders their movewent of toola and accessories. <br /> 4. It is difficult to see trepassers on their property with the <br /> fence being as high as it is. <br /> 5. A 42" fence would help their view to some degree and facilitate the <br /> handling of some of their gardening equi�nent. <br /> Thero was no further comment from the audiencc, <br /> After visual observation of tho subject property and considering all the facts <br /> and testimony it wae moved by Mr. Hoagland, seconded by Mr. Eckatrom and <br /> unanimously carried to deny the variance as ttie fence doea not meet the <br /> requiremente of the Zoning Code. <br /> Mr. Russell returned to the Board. <br /> A hearing was held on the application of Geotge Whalen, 15 Casino Road, Everett, <br /> Washington 98203, for a variance £ran Section 19.42,020 of thc Everett Municipal <br /> Code, Fences, Paragraph C, for permis3lon to construct ;� fence in the front <br /> yard five (5) feet in height rathcr than the Codc requirement of three and onc- <br /> half (3�) feet 1n height. <br /> -Z- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.