550 ALVERSON BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import

. � � �, residence. The applicant also proposes a 10 foot setback fnstead of the typicel 2U foot setback from the front property line along Alverson Blvd. FINDINOS AND CONCLUSIONS: Section 37.050.B states that nothing in EMC Chapter 19.37 is intended to preclude reasonable oconomic use of property as set forth hero(n. If the req�irement of this ardinance as applied to a speciflc lot would dany all roasoneble economic use of the lot, development will be permitted if the applicant demonshatea ail of the following to the satisie�ction of;he Planning Diroctor: 1. There Is no other reasonable use or feasible altemative to the proposed development with less(mpact on the envfronmentally senaftive area; and 2. The proposed development does not pose a threat to the public health, aafety and welfare on ar oH of the subject lot; and 3. My alteraGona pertnlBed to the requiremer.ts of this Ordinanca ehall bs the minimum necessary to allow for reasonable use of the property; and 4. The Inabflity of the applicant to derive reasonable economic use ot the property is not tha reault of acGons by the applicant fn aubdividing the property or adJusUng a boundary Iine theroby cxeating the undevelopable condlGon aftar the eftecUve data of this Ord(nance; end 5. The proposal miUgetea the impacts on tha environmentally eanaitive aroaa to tha maxlmum s�ent possible. The Planning Directora concluaions are as follows: 1. Th�n!i no oth�r iwsona6l�ua�a a1bm�Uw to fM propos�d d�w/oprn�nt wlth/ut lmpact upon tlN�nWronrn�nhlly t�naldw ana. The exisdng R-1 zoning allowa for at least a minimum of ons airpb hmily rosidence on a 8,000 squaro foot lot. The aubject parcel is approxirt►ately 15,525 aq.R. in area. The applicent proposea to conehuct a daylight basement slyle sinpM fzmily ' residence on tha aite eimilar to tha exiadny homes in the aroa. The propoeed residence hes a mein floor footprint of about 2304 aq.ft. wh�h indudea an attached garags. The reaidencs ia proposed with a 10'setb�dc from the front , property Ilne inatead oi the typical 20'roqulrod. This propaed atback would be conalatant with the reaidence (mmediately adjacent to ths s�;bject property at 548 Alvereon Blvd. In addition, the reduced aetback would also!iri�!the excavatlon required for the home and provide a rear yard aetback eroa irom Me newly reg,aded sbpe edge. 2. Th�propos�d devNopm�nt do�s not pos�a thnat to fh�publlc hwlth, sahty and►wltan on or on o/fh�aub/�ct IoG The adJofning lots on each side of the proposed site are devaloped with single family residencea. The geotechnical ropoR states that' ...tha uee of a daylipht basement and the excavadon that it requlres, will provide the most positive beneflt from a slope stability standpoint. The original pian by the prev(ous owner for constructing a residence on piers without a basement would have no signiflcant stabflizing effect