Laserfiche WebLink
.. <br /> DAVID L.NELSON AND ASSOCIATES,INC. <br /> — � ConsultingEnginecrinqGeology <br /> January 26, 1987 <br /> ProjE�ct No. 9387 <br /> Page two <br /> As approximately shown on thz enclos�d she��t M-1 , the block 'wall' has been <br /> constructed against the existingtfill soils, but hconcbrete drivewayloccurs some <br /> in front of and behind the 'wall . The existing <br /> distance from the 'wall' , and an exposed s�il area occurs up to the 'wall' . <br /> Presently, the surface of :he exposed soil area drains over the 'wall ' , but the <br /> concrete driveway drains into constructed drains which outfall into the approved <br /> o�tfall drainage system. The block 'wall ' censists of conventional 2'x2'x6' <br /> concrete ecology blocks, with concave and convex ribs, bottom and Lop. The 'wall' <br /> created by placing these blocks on top of �ach other generally makes up the <br /> northerly property line. Rockery rock has been placed alo�g the downslope side <br /> oP the 'wall' along the northeastern side. 7he 'wall' area created by the block <br /> ` stacking appears to have only a slight batter into the slope, if any. <br /> Opinions <br /> The use of ecology blocks is. generally limited to slope areas of marginally <br /> stab:e, to st�ble slopes, which are well dralned. If the slope areas are found <br /> to be marginally unstuble to unstable, the ecology blocks 9re not recommended. <br /> The natural soils wlthin the site appear Lo consist of dense glacial soils <br /> (glacial till) , whicti are considered normally stable. However, <br /> the artificial <br /> fill placed along the slope is not considered stable, since no evaluation or <br /> inspect!on for structural fill �as performed. We wouid consider tmis are to be <br /> marginally stable, with some question, since geotechnical evaluation was not <br /> performed. <br /> Based upon the understood development within the area, <br /> it appears that some <br /> rea�onable effort should be made to increase the suspected marginally siable <br /> and questionable fill area stability. Snort nf removal and replacement of the <br /> block 'wall' and total re-development, we anticipate that removal and replace- <br /> ment of the fil] soils behind the !.wzll ' •and adequate drainage be anticipated. <br /> ' To achieve a reasonably stable ecology block 'wall ' area, it appears that some <br /> specific improvements to the area should be made. <br /> Recommendatinns <br /> Rs shown on sheet �4-3, an extention of the existing concrete driveway is Dro- <br /> posed, together with regrading and erosion protection of the exposed soil areas. <br />