8220 BEVERLY BLVD 2016-01-01 MF Import

�j -�Z� f�-4>�i �� 'I� � ��n-�-. 7anuary 27, 1993 addressed in the resolution of intent to re=one. Staff recommends concurrence with the resoludons. Councilman Overstreet asked for the response of the neighbor to the north. Mr. Giffen said, "he neitl�er opposed nor supported the proposal." Coucilmembers expressed concern that the property owner should have been aware of the zoning designation when purchas►ng the property. Councilman Gipson was wnceme� if B-1 was a logical ttansition. Mr. Giffen felt it was. Councilman Diamond questioned enforcement of the zoning and .�hy the property o�.v�ur was given a business license. Attomey Mike WP�o!::::.sk;�.�.�ed that busmess licenses are a reguiatory matter for the collecdon of B&O tax and oOther ordinances enforcc the zoning code. Councilmembers eacpressed concem about a domino effect with other propertics in that area with relation to the zoning change. They asked if the property owner had considered purchasing property almady zoned for a small business. Mr. Giffen answered that the applicant's representadve could address that question. Reid Shxkey, 2924 Colby Avenue, representadng Mrs. Harrington, the property owner, recapped history aftcr the notice of violation had been issued. He told councilmembers to answer the question, "Regazdless of any violation dces this rezone make sense?" Her business is an intenor fumishings business and this house is very compatable for the business. Mrs. Hazrington was not aware of the wning problem. As far az the comp plan, many are based on present use. The map was reviewed again to further look at C-1 zoning across the strect and the Eusy intersecdon W see if other properties should be included in this amendment. Mr. Giffen explained that a SEPA review needed to be done and it would need to be remanded back to the Planning Commission. He also stated that The Comprehensive Plan is in the process of being updated. Councilman Moser spoke in opposition to this amendment. 33