303 E CASINO RD 2016-01-01 MF Import

� l ' , 4. The provision ot adequatc off-street parking, on-site circulation, a4d site access. Pindine: Une off-street parking space is r�quired to service the faciliry. Thc site has an area to park Ihe service vehicle on site. Conclusion: Adequate parking, circulation, and access exist on the site. 5. Compa!ibiiity of proposed structurct and I�:�provemeofs with surroundleg properties, including the size, height, location, setback and arrangements of ail proposed buildings r.nd fesillties, espec;elly as t6ey relate to Ilghl end shadow impacts on moi�e sensitive land uses and less intensive wnes. Findines; The proposed communication facility is locatecl in the C-I zone. The facility will meet the 50-foot height limitation and the ten-fcwt rear setback. The building will be placed Mtween a 19.5-foot tall ';:�ilding and SR 526. Conclusicm: The antennas on the rooRop may be noticeable. The equip:aent building will have no :ight or .>yadow impacts on nearby properties and will meet alI required setback. 6. The number, size and location of signs, especially as they rclate l�o more sensiNve laod uses. Findine; Sign Category A a��plies. No signs are proposed except informational signs. Conclusion: EMC 19.36.040.H exempts informational signs under six square feet from tegulation. 7. The lendscaping, buffering and screening of bufldings, perking, loading and storege ureas, especially as they relatc to more sensitive land uses. F➢ndine: l.andscape Category B applies to this propo�al. Category B requires a ten-foot widc landscaped strip with Type II landscaping along SR 526. Type II landscaping consists of a minimum uf one tree for every 20 feel of tength, five �hrubs for every ten feet of length, and groundcover. The applicant proposes to reduce the required landscape width from ten feet to approximately seven fat at the northeast corner of the proposed building. This landscape width includes A ponion of the landscape width includes Department of Transportation's right-of-way. Sabsection 35.070.A. of the Cily of Gverett Land Use Code givcs the Planning Direcror, using Review Process I, the authority to modify the required landscaping. Conclusion: The Planning Director approves the landscape dated February 24, 2003. 8. The gencration of miisance irritanls such as noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual blig6t or othcr undesirablc impucfa. Findine: The antennas will generate some visual blight but considering that it is along Evergr:en Way, ; the impacts will be minimal. 7fo