Laserfiche WebLink
To: Jane Zimmerman <br /> Cc: Jim Miller; Kirk Brooks <br /> Subject: RE: 8oeing plans (n for review <br /> I would say we need to knoN �.vhat the system looks like We still get reports from utizens about a solvent smell in <br /> Vowdermill on occasion, and the requirements of our NPDf 5 permit make us responsible for whatever gets into the <br /> M54. 7hi5 is akin lo lhr. situation at thc Port, whcre things have been put in over time th[rt we were not (ully aware o( <br /> (that's the polite way ot putting it�, and we necd full disdosure to protect our interests. <br /> From: lane 2immerman <br /> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 6:39 AM <br /> To; Heather Kibbey <br /> Cc: Jim Miller; Kirk Drooks <br /> 5ubjeet: Roeing plans in for revicw <br /> Hi Heath��r – <br /> I also need some direction regarding some 6oeing plans that are in (or review–the 7G7 Tow Path and the 40-91 parking <br /> lot... <br /> Each of these projects is impacting a fairly limited portion of the total Boeing site. However, there are a LOT of existing <br /> utilities(particularly storm drainage, but some sewer too irom what I can figure) shown on the plans that extend beyond <br /> the reaches of the impacted areas–and which are not shown in GoSync. Boeing has historically been a "big black box" <br /> for us in terms of knowing much of anything about the utilities on the site. Pipes go in, and pipes come out–kinda like a <br /> "Willy Wonka" airplane factory... In fact, w� show NO storm drainage pipes,etc.witfiin the perimeter of the Boeing site <br /> at all. <br /> Very limited changes are actually being made to the existing storm drainage system, but none-the-less, I don't have the <br /> in(ormation to know where the storm drainage comes from and goes to in the impacted areas. When this issue came up <br /> at the Everett Mall (see email trail below�, I was supported in requiring enough in(ormation[o"complete the pic[ure" <br /> when they showed existing drainage sVuctures with insuf(icient information for the City to be able to do any kind of <br /> effective illicit connection detection,etc.,even though I was pretty sure that the Mall would be reluctant to do so <br /> because of who they are–they don't think the same rules should appty to them as apply to lesser important <br /> developments in lhe City... Well,this is Boeing,and I think they're even more likely to object to providing the <br /> information. <br /> So my question is again -ought I just let these opportunities go7 Or do I ask for, and persist in getting, the information <br /> about the existing system that I need to really be able to review and approve these plans. <br /> And again (!�, please let me know what you think I oughter do. I wait humbly for direction from above. Thankz. <br /> Janc <br /> — — <br /> From: ]im Mi!ler <br /> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 7:57 AM <br /> To; ]ane Zimmerman; Heather Kibbey <br /> Subjed: RE: redevelopments <br /> 1 <br /> 3� <br />