Laserfiche WebLink
� �: <br /> In addition if the lots are developed with a non-residential commercial structure or a <br /> residential structure of five or more units lhen full standard half street improvements are <br /> required to Chestnut Street, including but not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalks, slreet <br /> widening and drafnage control per City Design Standards. <br /> Conclusion: Adequate provisions for access, utilities and public services for the proposal <br /> can be accommodated subJect to the above condidons. <br /> 3 pedestrrisn circulation and publ cysafety and tha abiilty of the p op nient to mitigate <br /> such potentlal impacts. <br /> Finding: The proposed addiUon of four new single-family residences will add to the <br /> average daily trips in the area. The City of Everett Public Services DepaRment has <br /> required that the alley be paved to City standards. <br /> Conclusion: No adverse impacts to traffic are anticipated as a result of the proposal. <br /> 4. The provision of adequate off-street parking, on-site circulatlon, and site access. <br /> Finding: A minimum of 2 off street parking spaces is required for each of the single-family <br /> residences. Access to the lots will be directly off of the alley. <br /> Conclusion: Off street parking, on site circulation, and site acc.�ss will be adequate. <br /> 5. Compatibllity of proposed structurea and improvementa with aurcounding <br /> properties, Including the sfze, height, locatlon, setback and arrangement of all <br /> proposed buildings and facllftles, especialiy as they relate to Ilght and ahadow <br /> impacts on more sensitive land uses and less intensive zones. <br /> Finding: The proposal is to construct four single-family residences. The surrounding area <br /> is developed with residential, commercial, and industrial uses. Since lhe lots are less than <br /> 5,000 square feet in area, lhe single-family residence must comply with the Small Lot <br /> Development Standards as established in Section 7 of the City oi Everett Zoning Code. <br /> Conclusion: The proposed residential use oi the property is compatible with existing <br /> developments in the area. <br /> 6. The number, size and location of signs,especially as they relate to more senaitive <br /> land uses. <br /> Finding: No signage is proposed for the dwelflngs other than address identificalion. <br /> Conclusion: Signage for the site is regulated under Section 36 of the Everett Zoning <br /> Code. <br /> 7. The landscaping, buHering and screening of bufldings, parking, loading and storaga <br /> areas, especially as they rolate to more sensitive land uses. <br /> �� <br /> � <br />