My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1431 COLBY AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
COLBY AVE
>
1431
>
1431 COLBY AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2017 11:00:27 PM
Creation date
1/26/2017 11:00:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
COLBY AVE
Street Number
1431
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Paul McKee <br /> Va:ianae 1-89 <br /> Page -3- <br /> C. A hardship �.ould be incurred by the Applicant if cequired to <br /> �:omply with the strict application of the section or sectior.s <br /> identified in Section 6.A.1 herein. (administcative finding) <br /> 8. Dcceptional circumstances exist for the granting of a vaciance. <br /> Hecause the single lot has two structures on it, the Applicant's <br /> application for a variance is warranted. (Wood testimony, staff report) <br /> 9. 'Ihe granting of a variance will not be detrimental to the public <br /> aelfare or injucious to the property in the vicinity in which it is <br /> located. Beaause thece are two single family dwellings on one lot, the <br /> division of the lot will prwide a systematic division of the proEerty <br /> in order to create two separate lots in the acea. (Wood testimony) <br /> 10. Without the variance, a hardship woulA �c incurced by the Applicant. <br /> Because of the limitation of one residence per lot, the l�pplicant could <br /> be restricted in the sale and finance of the two houses. (staff <br /> report) <br /> ll. A letter of protest was received in opposition to the variance fran <br /> Williavn E. H�mvnel. He requested that the property not ne short platted <br /> and that the current zoning is appropriate for the propecty. (exhibit <br /> 4) <br /> 12. 1t�e setback varfance is sought for the lot at 1931 Colby Avenue. Zhe <br /> setback is sought in ocder that the garage on site can remain even <br /> though it does not satisfy the setback standards for this particular <br /> zone. (Wood testimony) <br /> 13. 'Itie �erett Planning Department recoimiended approval of the variance. <br /> (staff report) <br /> 14. A Witness (Oursler) submitted no opposition to the request of the <br /> Applicant but was concerned about any change in the use of properties <br /> in the area. She su6mitted that effort should be made to protect the <br /> single family nature of the neighborhood. <br /> CONCfAS IONS <br /> 1. Zhe application is for the approval. cf variances to allow two <br /> substandard lots to be created by a short subdivision and for a <br /> reduction of the five foot setback to a .46 setback for an existing <br /> garage on one of the lots, the lot at 1931 Colby Avenue. <br /> 2. Section 6.A of Ordinance 1119-85, as amended by Ordinance 1327-87, <br /> allows for variances for division of land with existing structures on <br /> it. �ifie Applicant's request comes under this jucisdictional <br /> authority. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.