Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � • _ _ <br /> � • • 1 Snohomish County Numan Services <br /> :�"u� SPU 4-91 <br /> Page —5— <br /> i� I' <br /> �. <br /> 15. The Applicant will utilize aigns to provide access information to the <br />_ i',} site. However, the number, s1ze, and locations of signa will be <br /> "' sensitive to the propoaed development. The signs crill be reviewed by <br /> i d the City of Everett Planning Department pursuant to the scandards as sel• <br /> i E� forth in EZC 36.190. I <br /> :Y <br />'p `i 16. Landscaping exists on Colby and Califomia which will be adequate for <br /> r� the uae of the subject property. <br /> �� <br /> ; 17. The ro osed :levelo � il <br /> p p pment �rill not result in increased noise, sooke, <br /> �? dust, odor, glare, or visual blight. <br /> _ �' 18. The City of Everett submitted that its policy is to make the central <br /> ��� city area the [o riorit and focus for new develo ent and <br /> � P P 9 Pm I <br /> re-development in the communi[y. Part of this plan is to encourage the <br /> vitality and economic health of the central area with a diverse and � <br /> ' '� compact downtown retail shopping district. One of the goals of the City <br /> y' in carrying out thic policy is to mazimize s[reet level retail activity <br /> ;;' �,' crithin the Cen[ral Business District. As a result, the City determined I <br /> F, that the building facade on—site should satisfy the requirements of EZC <br /> 22.020.D that requires traneparent areas with views into the structure I <br /> �; from the outside. Acwrding to the City, this same impression should be i <br /> . created on—sitr. The City in33cated that the visual treatment of [he , <br /> windows within the building sliould be handled in a "pedestrian friendly I <br />� �` m,nner". i <br /> �, I <br /> j 19. The Applicant submitted that the services on—site are developed to ' <br /> provide for the humaa needs of the Couuty and to serve a critical public <br /> need. To require a facade of a retail—like environment would not be I <br /> consistent witl this purpose. It would not be consistent with the i <br /> ' City's previous allowed use of the propercy by a title company. <br /> ' 20. The owner's representative of the subject property testified that the 'I <br /> office was developed as office space, and it should be uaed as such. He <br /> su�itted that the space will be remodeled to code and crill pass all � <br /> requirements oE the City. He supported the five—year plan of the <br /> Applicant for the use of the space . <br /> 21. A representative oE the State of Washington Office of Hearings submitted <br /> ' that the building is open between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. He testified <br /> ehat it would be helpful if the building owner would provide clieat <br /> restrooms inetead of relying upan the current system which requires <br /> admission to the facilities hy personnel within the building. <br /> 22. The proposal complies with the provisions of EZC 41.150 and the Zoning <br /> Ordinances of ttie City of Everett. <br /> I <br /> , � <br /> I <br /> � <br /> - J <br />