3202 COLBY AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

i • � Social Security Administration SPU 7-91 Page -6- 29. The Applicant aubmitted that there is very little difference from the darntown core and the proposed site. Measures to mitigate traffic, to encourage handicap pedeatrian acceas, and to provide easy accesaibility for the public are available on-aite. As part of the mitigation, the Applicant crill pay �13,600 ae part of the procesa to develop pedestrian rempe. 30. The Applicant aubmitted that ihe sub�ect property ia the cloaest site to the Doxntown General Service B-3 zoned district that was acceptable to the GSA. 31. At the public hearing a �ritnesa, Robert Trosvig, testified to be an owner of property south of the subject property. He su6mitted tha� because of the excesaive parking and increased traffic, the City should coneider denying the Special Property Uae Pe�mit. Further, he su�itted that the lang term use of the property should be coneidered before granting a Special Property Use Pezmit. 32. The Applicant testified that the term of the lease will be for ten yeara. Approximately 75x of the building wlll be used for social aecurity purposes. CONCLUSIONS 1. The application ia for the approval of a Special Property Uae Permit to locate a government service outside the Gover�nent Service Area within a B-3 zoned dietrict. The property ia located at 3202 Colby Avenue, Everett, Washiugton. It is zoned R-5 (C-0). 2. EZC 41.150.D(1)A requires a Special Property Use Permit in order to locate a goveraaent service outside the Gover�ent Service Area in a B-3 zoned district. 3. In order for a Special Property Use Permit to be granted wi[h the City of Everett, the criteria as set forth in EZC 41.150.A-J muat be satisfied. Those criteria have been identified and addreased in the findinga. 4. There is a need for the propoaed Special Property Uae Permit. Phe easy accessibility of the site for the elderly who use the social security service creates the need. 5. The streets, utilitiea, and public services required to serve the proposed site are adequate. 6. The impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on the surrounding area, the pedestrian circulation and public safety, and the ability of the Appllcant to mitigate the potential impacts will exiat. With improvements to the site for pedestrian circulation, the impacts Erom traffic and parking are minimal.