Laserfiche WebLink
16 <br /> ,,,,::"-,-:1 <br /> Op <br /> CITY OF EVERETT <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 20 O f - G <br /> A Resolution Recommending that the City Council <br /> Approve (1) An Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map <br /> Designation From Single Family (1.2) to Public-Quasi Public Facilities (2.8), <br /> (2) a Rezone from R-1 (Single Family) to R-1-I (Institutional) Zone, and (3) That the <br /> Existing Special Property Use Permit (#16-84) be Voided Upon City Council Passage of the <br /> Necessary Comprehensive Plan and Rezone Ordinances for the Area Located East of <br /> Beverly Boulevard at 756 Street for Snohomish County Public Utility District#1. <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Everett adopted a new Comprehensive Plan in August, 1994, in <br /> conformance with the Washington State Growth Management Act; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, codified as Chapter 36.70A, allows for <br /> comprehensive plans to be amended on an annual basis; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Everett initiated its 2004 annual comprehensive plan amendment <br /> process in July, 2004, which included consideration of Land Use Map amendments and rezone <br /> applications initiated by property owners; and <br /> WHEREAS, Snohomish County Public Utility District #1 (PUD) submitted an application for an <br /> amendment to the Land Use Map for its 13 acre switching yard located east of Beverly <br /> Boulevard at 75th Street, from Single Family (1.2) to Public-Quasi Public (2.8), as indicated on <br /> the attached map (Exhibit"A"); and <br /> WHEREAS, the proposed action also includes a change in zoning from R-1 (Single Family) to <br /> R-1-I (Institution) for the subject site; and <br /> WHEREAS, the proposal is based on a 20 year, three phase Master Plan, with graphic depiction <br /> of each phase, submitted to the City by the PUD in support of the rezone request as required <br /> (EMC 33B.030); and <br /> WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held two public hearings on the matter, on February 15, <br /> 2005 and continued it to March 1, 2005, at which they continued public testimony, heard PUD <br /> and staff presentations and considered the various aspects of the proposal; and <br /> WHEREAS, the PUD presentation on February 15, 2005 to the Planning Commission and public <br /> included a description of the need for long term predictability for the site. <br /> 137 - 1 - <br />