My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6515 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
6515
>
6515 EVERGREEN WAY 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2017 11:05:04 AM
Creation date
2/9/2017 10:39:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
6515
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
( <br />PUBL/L <br />October 19, 2000 <br />Storm Keffeler <br />12E14 Roosevelt Road <br />Snohomish, WA 98290 <br />I:E: nwner: <br />Job Address: <br />Plan Check No <br />Dear Mr. Keffeler: <br />N/O/� <br />Tetrick <br />G501 Rainier Avenue <br />B9912-050 <br />( <br />In response to your application for a construction permit, your plans have been examined and you <br />are advised that t�he issuance of a permit is being withheld for the reasons listed below. i hese <br />comments address building issues only, additional revisions or additions may Ue required by other <br />departments (such as Utilities, Planning or Fire). All references refer to thf: 1997 Uniform <br />Building Code, as amended by the State of Washington and/or Washington 3tate Ene:gy Code <br />1997 Edition, unless stated otherwise. <br />In order for the processing of your application to continue, it will be necessary to provide the <br />Building Division with two complete n�w sets of drawings retleciing the corrections <br />requested. <br />The plans indicate the office bu� 9ing as being a separate building (Bldg. "O"). If <br />this is the intention, then there would be a 2-hr. area separation required. A section <br />throueh this wall would be required to assure that it would meet aU of the area <br />separation requirements (UBC 504.6). It seems possiUle that there is no need for <br />an area separation or even occupancy separation. If this is the case, then the plans <br />should be revised accordingly. - <br />2. The travel distance from the center area of the 2nd level of Buitding A exceeds the <br />250 ft. limit set in UBC 1004.2.5. <br />The hallway on the upper floor of Building B, between storage units 421, 423, 425, <br />427 and 428, 429, 430, 431 exceNds the 20ft. maximum set in UBC 1004.2.6. <br />4. The live load for which the upper level was designed to support (125 ps� is <br />required to be posted throu�hout with durable metal signs iocared in conspicuous <br />locations. This requi:ement should be on the construction documents. <br />5. Sheet 6/6 should be revised so that the notes and details indicate thc construction <br />design and methods of the Rib • Roof tloor system. <br />0[UI� PI.SCAlItiTR`\IILLER'Rdl W F.0. a\i @y�l � � <br />z <br />CITY OF EVERETT• 32C0 Cedar Sfreet • Everetl WA 98201 •(425) 257-8800 • Fax (425) 257-8856 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.