Laserfiche WebLink
Y. <br />Bob Landles <br />Pon Mi. C?xneron <br />June 26, 1978 <br />Reinir,ga Shopping Center at 75th Street and Evergreen WayrroF EVEFETT. EVENETT, wasMincrou <br />The reassignment of trips was made considering the affecting local factors discussed in the first section.. <br />Tiiey result in new intersection turning movement volumes at the driveways. <br />A higher amount of traffic will be oriented to or from the south doing business at the other local retail <br />development, coming or going via SR 526, or generated by the extensive new residential expansion taking <br />place south of 75 Street. Traffic to and from the north will be smaller because it travels via SR 5 and <br />SR 526 to Evergreen or to/from the Mall combining shopping trips. Traffic oriented toward 19 SE or <br />the 'Mall can use 75 St, Beverly Blvd, and S Broadway as an alternative southern trip route and is shown <br />as estimated 5%. Travel to the west has a faster path via the free right -(out -bound) at SR 526 and then <br />via 20 Ave W (new connections) or the speedway to Mukilteo. The newly planned 5,000 home Chevron <br />property development will increase the SR 526 western volume. <br />ilI. Projected traffic operation concerng impacts that will require resolution include: <br />1. The western driveway on Evergreen Way will require signalization to accomadate traffic <br />movinPP��wit e-spmmercial area as well as employee and service trips. At least <br />35%�'b th 14,000�ips can be expected to use this access point resulting in an approach <br />volumepf' .-4 U-ilo-hvergreen Way. This volume meets signal warrants. <br />Tne Evergreen driveway and center design should encourage traffic to use 'this access <br />rather than 75 St. reducing total intersection trip increases. <br />2. The additional 1750 trips on 75 St between Bevery Blvd and the center will endanger <br />pedestrian travel along this route. Signalization of 75 St and Beverly Blvd. could be <br />required depending on additional traffic being generated. Total volume on this leg of <br />75 St will approach" VPD. <br />rFin. QOOO <br />3. The west side of 75 St. between Beverly Lane and Evergreen will be impac,:ed but not <br />as severely as the east side: = - <br />• 4. 75 St along &e Center froth age will be subject to queuing and" Masse'd turning movements <br />without geometric control. Conflicts between the high volume gas station on the north, <br />\�% 75 St. traflic,�and Center traffic will occur without major improvements. <br />(1, •),.. <br />-5. The western most- driveway -on _75 St. will result in 5B left turVraffic driving across <br />-,two to three lanes rather than merging smoothly -across.: Particular hazard would be <br />created Sy this driveway for NB free,right turn traffic and the SB lefts. This driveway <br />could segue the center but would create hazard on 75 Street. It was not shown on the <br />original plan. <br />t <br />6. Widening 75 ST would provide easier access to the center at the cost of additional crossing <br />time for✓ vehicles arrd pedestrians: '75 St volumes in 'ioA of the center would include <br />at least ihalf oq the newly grnerated-V(esf arid-norttrtrsffie - 2100 of the :14,000 trips. <br />More than -.three quarters&T�ese trips would be new trlpsito 75 St. but not new to - <br />the area. M180%,estimate new trips would increase 75 St.traffic from 3200 to 4900 <br />along Me center front. Abcut half of the traffic traveling this portion of 75 St would <br />be involved In center driveway turning manuevers. The high 1V% of turning manuevers <br />is not of contributory to high vehicle accident rates but�als aarcera��as increases <br />dangers pedestrians. ` <br />