Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> � <br /> , <br /> were only four residents on-site, �II members of the Appellant's family. <br /> This is not evidenc� of an RV Park on-site. <br /> 3. The AppellanYs contention in a letter to the City of Everett is that the RV <br /> park is new to the area. There is no non-conforming use. <br /> 4. The County Building Permit provided by the Appellant does not establish <br /> a non-conforming use. The County Building Permit serves no probative <br /> value because it is unreadable due to the q�ality of the copy. However, <br /> even if the County Building Permit did establish a historic non-confotming <br /> use, that use has been shown to have been abandoned at the time of <br /> annexation in 1989 and at the time the Appellant filed the letter of August <br /> 25, 1998, with the City of Everett (exhibit 6). <br /> DECISION <br /> Based upon the preceding findings of facts and conclusions, testimony and <br /> evidence submitted at the public hParing, it is hereby ordered that there is no <br /> non-conforming use that exists on , s subject property. <br /> Done and dated this 15"' day of October, 1999. <br /> w �i. �,� <br /> Jam . Driscoll <br /> Hearing Examiner <br /> � <br />